Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Buckled Beams as Negative Stiffness Elements for Passive Vibration and Shock Isolation SystemsSource: Journal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 003::page 31009Author:Fulcher, Benjamin A.
,
Shahan, David W.
,
Haberman, Michael R.
,
Conner Seepersad, Carolyn
,
Wilson, Preston S.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4026888Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The behavior of a buckled beam mechanism, which exhibits both bistability and negative stiffness, is investigated for the purposes of passive shock and vibration isolation. The vibration and shock isolation systems investigated in this research include linear, positive stiffness springs in parallel with the transverse motion of buckled beams, resulting in quasizero stiffness behavior. For vibration isolation systems, quasizero stiffness lowers the resonance frequency of the system, thereby reducing its transmissibility at frequencies greater than resonance. For shock isolation systems, quasizero stiffness provides constantforce shock isolation at tailored force levels, thereby enabling increased capacity for absorbing shock energy relative to a comparable positive stiffness system. Singleand doublebeam configurations that exhibit firstmode buckling are utilized for vibration isolation, and a single beam that exhibits firstand thirdmode buckling is used for shock isolation. For all cases, the static and dynamic behavior of each configuration is modeled analytically. The models are then used to design prototype vibration and shock isolation systems that are fabricated using selective laser sintering (SLS). The dynamic behavior of the systems in response to base excitations is determined experimentally, and the results are compared to modelbased predictions. The vibration isolation prototypes display isolation levels that are tunable by varying the axial compression of the beams. Doublebeam systems are shown to provide greater reductions in resonance frequency than singlebeam systems for comparable levels of axial compression. However, lowfrequency isolation capabilities are sensitive to the high levels of precision required to obtain low levels of system stiffness. The shock isolation prototype provides isolation at prespecified threshold levels of force or acceleration. In the prototype system, an input shock with a peak acceleration of approximately 7 g is reduced to a peak acceleration of the isolated mass of approximately 1 g. High levels of negative acceleration are observed in models and prototype systems when the buckled beam snaps back to its original position; however, models indicate that large negative accelerations can be mitigated using oneway dampers.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Fulcher, Benjamin A. | |
| contributor author | Shahan, David W. | |
| contributor author | Haberman, Michael R. | |
| contributor author | Conner Seepersad, Carolyn | |
| contributor author | Wilson, Preston S. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:14:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:14:06Z | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 1048-9002 | |
| identifier other | vib_136_03_031009.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156757 | |
| description abstract | The behavior of a buckled beam mechanism, which exhibits both bistability and negative stiffness, is investigated for the purposes of passive shock and vibration isolation. The vibration and shock isolation systems investigated in this research include linear, positive stiffness springs in parallel with the transverse motion of buckled beams, resulting in quasizero stiffness behavior. For vibration isolation systems, quasizero stiffness lowers the resonance frequency of the system, thereby reducing its transmissibility at frequencies greater than resonance. For shock isolation systems, quasizero stiffness provides constantforce shock isolation at tailored force levels, thereby enabling increased capacity for absorbing shock energy relative to a comparable positive stiffness system. Singleand doublebeam configurations that exhibit firstmode buckling are utilized for vibration isolation, and a single beam that exhibits firstand thirdmode buckling is used for shock isolation. For all cases, the static and dynamic behavior of each configuration is modeled analytically. The models are then used to design prototype vibration and shock isolation systems that are fabricated using selective laser sintering (SLS). The dynamic behavior of the systems in response to base excitations is determined experimentally, and the results are compared to modelbased predictions. The vibration isolation prototypes display isolation levels that are tunable by varying the axial compression of the beams. Doublebeam systems are shown to provide greater reductions in resonance frequency than singlebeam systems for comparable levels of axial compression. However, lowfrequency isolation capabilities are sensitive to the high levels of precision required to obtain low levels of system stiffness. The shock isolation prototype provides isolation at prespecified threshold levels of force or acceleration. In the prototype system, an input shock with a peak acceleration of approximately 7 g is reduced to a peak acceleration of the isolated mass of approximately 1 g. High levels of negative acceleration are observed in models and prototype systems when the buckled beam snaps back to its original position; however, models indicate that large negative accelerations can be mitigated using oneway dampers. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Buckled Beams as Negative Stiffness Elements for Passive Vibration and Shock Isolation Systems | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Vibration and Acoustics | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4026888 | |
| journal fristpage | 31009 | |
| journal lastpage | 31009 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8927 | |
| tree | Journal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |