YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Application of Wall Similarity Techniques to Determine Wall Shear Velocity in Smooth and Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005::page 51204
    Author:
    Walker, Jessica M.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4026512
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layer profiles are frequently scaled using the wall shear velocity u*, thus it is important that u* is accurately known. This paper reviews and assesses several wall similarity techniques to determine u* and compares results with data from the total stress, Preston tube, and direct force methods. The performance of each method was investigated using experimental repeatability data of smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layer profiles at Reخ¸ of 3330 and 4840, respectively, obtained using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) in a recirculating water tunnel. To validate the results, an analysis was also performed on the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of Jimenez et al. (2010, “Turbulent Boundary Layers and Channels at Moderate Reynolds Numbers,â€‌ J. Fluid Mech., 657, pp. 335–360) at Reخ¸â€‰= 1968. The inner layer similarity methods of Bradshaw had low experimental uncertainty and accurately determined u* and خµ for the DNS data and are the recommended wall similarity methods for turbulent boundary layer profile analysis. The outer layer similarity methods did not perform well, due to the need to simultaneously solve for three parameters: u*, خµ, and خ . It is strongly recommended that the u* values determined using wall similarity techniques are independently verified using another method such as the total stress or direct force methods.
    • Download: (1.012Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Application of Wall Similarity Techniques to Determine Wall Shear Velocity in Smooth and Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/154983
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWalker, Jessica M.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:08:31Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:08:31Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_136_05_051204.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154983
    description abstractSmooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layer profiles are frequently scaled using the wall shear velocity u*, thus it is important that u* is accurately known. This paper reviews and assesses several wall similarity techniques to determine u* and compares results with data from the total stress, Preston tube, and direct force methods. The performance of each method was investigated using experimental repeatability data of smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layer profiles at Reخ¸ of 3330 and 4840, respectively, obtained using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) in a recirculating water tunnel. To validate the results, an analysis was also performed on the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of Jimenez et al. (2010, “Turbulent Boundary Layers and Channels at Moderate Reynolds Numbers,â€‌ J. Fluid Mech., 657, pp. 335–360) at Reخ¸â€‰= 1968. The inner layer similarity methods of Bradshaw had low experimental uncertainty and accurately determined u* and خµ for the DNS data and are the recommended wall similarity methods for turbulent boundary layer profile analysis. The outer layer similarity methods did not perform well, due to the need to simultaneously solve for three parameters: u*, خµ, and خ . It is strongly recommended that the u* values determined using wall similarity techniques are independently verified using another method such as the total stress or direct force methods.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Application of Wall Similarity Techniques to Determine Wall Shear Velocity in Smooth and Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4026512
    journal fristpage51204
    journal lastpage51204
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian