Evaluation of RANS Models in Predicting Low Reynolds, Free, Turbulent Round JetSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001::page 11201DOI: 10.1115/1.4025363Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In order to study the flow behavior of multiple jets, numerical prediction of the threedimensional domain of round jets from the nozzle edge up to the turbulent region is essential. The previous numerical studies on the round jet are limited to either twodimensional investigation with Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models or threedimensional prediction with higher turbulence models such as large eddy simulation (LES) or direct numerical simulation (DNS). The present study tries to evaluate different RANS turbulence models in the threedimensional simulation of the whole domain of an isothermal, low Re (Re = 2125, 3461, and 4555), free, turbulent round jet. For this evaluation the simulation results from two twoequation (low Re kة› and low Re shear stress transport (SST) kد‰), a transition threeequation (kklد‰), and a transition fourequation (SST) eddyviscosity turbulence models are compared with hotwire anemometry measurements. Due to the importance of providing correct inlet boundary conditions, the inlet velocity profile, the turbulent kinetic energy (k), and its specific dissipation rate (د‰) at the nozzle exit have been employed from an earlier verified numerical simulation. Twoequation RANS models with low Reynolds correction can predict the whole domain (initial, transition, and fully developed regions) of the round jet with prescribed inlet boundary conditions. The transition models could only reach to a good agreement with the measured mean axial velocities and its rms in the initial region. It worth mentioning that the round jet anomaly is still present in the turbulent region of the round jet predicted by the low Re kة›. By comparing the k and the د‰ predicted by different turbulence models, the blending functions in the crossdiffusion term is found one of the reasons behind the more consistent prediction by the low Re SST kد‰.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Ghahremanian, Shahriar | |
| contributor author | Moshfegh, Bahram | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:08:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:08:22Z | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_136_01_011201.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154925 | |
| description abstract | In order to study the flow behavior of multiple jets, numerical prediction of the threedimensional domain of round jets from the nozzle edge up to the turbulent region is essential. The previous numerical studies on the round jet are limited to either twodimensional investigation with Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models or threedimensional prediction with higher turbulence models such as large eddy simulation (LES) or direct numerical simulation (DNS). The present study tries to evaluate different RANS turbulence models in the threedimensional simulation of the whole domain of an isothermal, low Re (Re = 2125, 3461, and 4555), free, turbulent round jet. For this evaluation the simulation results from two twoequation (low Re kة› and low Re shear stress transport (SST) kد‰), a transition threeequation (kklد‰), and a transition fourequation (SST) eddyviscosity turbulence models are compared with hotwire anemometry measurements. Due to the importance of providing correct inlet boundary conditions, the inlet velocity profile, the turbulent kinetic energy (k), and its specific dissipation rate (د‰) at the nozzle exit have been employed from an earlier verified numerical simulation. Twoequation RANS models with low Reynolds correction can predict the whole domain (initial, transition, and fully developed regions) of the round jet with prescribed inlet boundary conditions. The transition models could only reach to a good agreement with the measured mean axial velocities and its rms in the initial region. It worth mentioning that the round jet anomaly is still present in the turbulent region of the round jet predicted by the low Re kة›. By comparing the k and the د‰ predicted by different turbulence models, the blending functions in the crossdiffusion term is found one of the reasons behind the more consistent prediction by the low Re SST kد‰. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Evaluation of RANS Models in Predicting Low Reynolds, Free, Turbulent Round Jet | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4025363 | |
| journal fristpage | 11201 | |
| journal lastpage | 11201 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |