Why do Fish Have a “Fish Like Geometry�Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001::page 11106Author:Kagemoto, Hiroshi
DOI: 10.1115/1.4025646Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Most fish share a common geometry, a streamlined anterior body and a deep caudal fin, connected to each other at a tailbase neck, where the body almost shrinks to a point. This work attempts to explain the reason that fish exhibit this type of geometry. Assuming that the fishlike geometry is a result of evolution over millions of years, or, that bodies of modernday fish have been optimized in some manner as a result of evolution, this work investigates the optimum geometry for a swimming object through existing mathematical optimization techniques to check whether the result obtained is the same as the naturally observed fishlike geometry. In this analysis, the work done by a swimming object is taken as the objective function of the optimization. It is found that a fishlike geometry is in fact obtained mathematically, provided that the appropriate constraints are imposed on the optimization process, which, in turn, provides some clues that explain the reason that fish have a fishlike geometry.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Kagemoto, Hiroshi | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:08:21Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:08:21Z | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_136_01_011106.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154922 | |
| description abstract | Most fish share a common geometry, a streamlined anterior body and a deep caudal fin, connected to each other at a tailbase neck, where the body almost shrinks to a point. This work attempts to explain the reason that fish exhibit this type of geometry. Assuming that the fishlike geometry is a result of evolution over millions of years, or, that bodies of modernday fish have been optimized in some manner as a result of evolution, this work investigates the optimum geometry for a swimming object through existing mathematical optimization techniques to check whether the result obtained is the same as the naturally observed fishlike geometry. In this analysis, the work done by a swimming object is taken as the objective function of the optimization. It is found that a fishlike geometry is in fact obtained mathematically, provided that the appropriate constraints are imposed on the optimization process, which, in turn, provides some clues that explain the reason that fish have a fishlike geometry. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Why do Fish Have a “Fish Like Geometry� | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4025646 | |
| journal fristpage | 11106 | |
| journal lastpage | 11106 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |