YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of the Thermal Performance of Damaged and Intact Shock Absorber

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 005::page 51601
    Author:
    Bang, Kyoung
    ,
    Lee, Ju
    ,
    Seo, Chung
    ,
    Seo, Ki
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4024441
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Regulatory requirements for a Type B package are specified in the Korea MEST Act 200937, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. TSR1, and US 10 CFR Part 71. These regulatory guidelines require that a Type B package for transporting radioactive materials should be able to withstand a test sequence consisting of a 9 m drop onto an unyielding surface, a 1 m drop onto a puncture bar, and a period of 30 min under a thermal condition of 800 آ°C. To evaluate the thermal shielding effect of a shock absorber, a thermal test was performed using a half scale model with shock absorber, which was damaged by both a 9 m drop test and a 1 m puncture test. For the purpose of comparison, the thermal test was also carried out using a half scale model with intact shock absorber. The maximum temperature of the seal in the upper part was measured at 273 آ°C, which is higher than the manufacturer's recommended maximum temperature in the thermal test using damaged shock absorber. This is because the shock absorber, which was broken in the drop test, was almost burned. However, the maximum temperature of the seal in the upper part was measured at 249 آ°C, which is lower than the manufacturer's recommended maximum temperature in the thermal test using intact shock absorber. Therefore, to maintain the containment boundary of the hotcell cask, it is important that the manufacturing of the shock absorber prevent failure of shock absorber housing.
    • Download: (2.835Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of the Thermal Performance of Damaged and Intact Shock Absorber

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/153094
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBang, Kyoung
    contributor authorLee, Ju
    contributor authorSeo, Chung
    contributor authorSeo, Ki
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:02:26Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:02:26Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_135_05_051601.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153094
    description abstractRegulatory requirements for a Type B package are specified in the Korea MEST Act 200937, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. TSR1, and US 10 CFR Part 71. These regulatory guidelines require that a Type B package for transporting radioactive materials should be able to withstand a test sequence consisting of a 9 m drop onto an unyielding surface, a 1 m drop onto a puncture bar, and a period of 30 min under a thermal condition of 800 آ°C. To evaluate the thermal shielding effect of a shock absorber, a thermal test was performed using a half scale model with shock absorber, which was damaged by both a 9 m drop test and a 1 m puncture test. For the purpose of comparison, the thermal test was also carried out using a half scale model with intact shock absorber. The maximum temperature of the seal in the upper part was measured at 273 آ°C, which is higher than the manufacturer's recommended maximum temperature in the thermal test using damaged shock absorber. This is because the shock absorber, which was broken in the drop test, was almost burned. However, the maximum temperature of the seal in the upper part was measured at 249 آ°C, which is lower than the manufacturer's recommended maximum temperature in the thermal test using intact shock absorber. Therefore, to maintain the containment boundary of the hotcell cask, it is important that the manufacturing of the shock absorber prevent failure of shock absorber housing.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of the Thermal Performance of Damaged and Intact Shock Absorber
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4024441
    journal fristpage51601
    journal lastpage51601
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian