YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of Code Case 2605 for Fatigue Evaluation of Vessels Made in 2.25Cr 1Mo 0.25V Steels Slightly Into Creep Range

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 004::page 41401
    Author:
    Tereda, Susumu
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4023727
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The current Section VIII Division 2 of ASME code permits only the method based on experience with comparable equipment of paragraph 5.5.2.2 to be used for the exemption from fatigue analysis when the design allowable stress is taken in the time dependent temperature range and the specified minimum tensile strength is greater than 552 MPa. In the case of 2.25Cr1Mo0.25V steels, the allowable stress of new Div.2 is higher than that of the old Div.2. Therefore, there are no experiences with comparable equipment. Code Case 26051 provides rules for fatigue evaluation of 2.25Cr1Mo0.25V steels at temperatures greater than 371 آ°C and equal to or less than 454 آ°C. An inelastic analysis including the effect of creep is required to be performed for all pressure parts according to Code Case 26051. There are six and more types of nozzles in each hydroprocessing reactor. The inelastic analyses shall be performed for all types of nozzles. The simplified screening method for fatigue analyses and the simplified fatigue analysis procedure need to be developed because it takes much time to perform inelastic analyses. This paper provides sample analysis results for various types of nozzles and clarifies issue with respect to implementation of Code Case 26051. Then, a proposal for simplification and modification of Option 1 and Option 2 fatigue evaluation methods for nozzles of Code Case 26051 are proposed from these investigations.
    • Download: (3.194Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Application of Code Case 2605 for Fatigue Evaluation of Vessels Made in 2.25Cr 1Mo 0.25V Steels Slightly Into Creep Range

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/153061
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTereda, Susumu
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:02:21Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:02:21Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_135_4_041401.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153061
    description abstractThe current Section VIII Division 2 of ASME code permits only the method based on experience with comparable equipment of paragraph 5.5.2.2 to be used for the exemption from fatigue analysis when the design allowable stress is taken in the time dependent temperature range and the specified minimum tensile strength is greater than 552 MPa. In the case of 2.25Cr1Mo0.25V steels, the allowable stress of new Div.2 is higher than that of the old Div.2. Therefore, there are no experiences with comparable equipment. Code Case 26051 provides rules for fatigue evaluation of 2.25Cr1Mo0.25V steels at temperatures greater than 371 آ°C and equal to or less than 454 آ°C. An inelastic analysis including the effect of creep is required to be performed for all pressure parts according to Code Case 26051. There are six and more types of nozzles in each hydroprocessing reactor. The inelastic analyses shall be performed for all types of nozzles. The simplified screening method for fatigue analyses and the simplified fatigue analysis procedure need to be developed because it takes much time to perform inelastic analyses. This paper provides sample analysis results for various types of nozzles and clarifies issue with respect to implementation of Code Case 26051. Then, a proposal for simplification and modification of Option 1 and Option 2 fatigue evaluation methods for nozzles of Code Case 26051 are proposed from these investigations.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleApplication of Code Case 2605 for Fatigue Evaluation of Vessels Made in 2.25Cr 1Mo 0.25V Steels Slightly Into Creep Range
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4023727
    journal fristpage41401
    journal lastpage41401
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian