YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Elastic and Plastic Reference Volume Approaches

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001::page 11202
    Author:
    Reddy Gudimetla, P. S.
    ,
    Katna, Munaswamy
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4007288
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: For finding out reliable limit load multipliers in pressure vessel components or structures using simplified limit load methods, proper estimation of reference volume is important. In this paper, two empirical methods namely elastic reference volume method (ERVM) and plastic reference volume method (PRVM) for reference volume correction are presented and compared. These reference volume correction concepts are used in combination with mخ±tangent method and elastic modulus adjustment procedure to achieve converged limit load multiplier solution. These multipliers are compared with nonlinear finite element analysis results and are found to be lower bounded. Elastic reference volume method is the simplest method for reference volume correction when compared to plastic reference volume method.
    • Download: (2.660Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Elastic and Plastic Reference Volume Approaches

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/153015
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorReddy Gudimetla, P. S.
    contributor authorKatna, Munaswamy
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:02:14Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:02:14Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_135_1_011202.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153015
    description abstractFor finding out reliable limit load multipliers in pressure vessel components or structures using simplified limit load methods, proper estimation of reference volume is important. In this paper, two empirical methods namely elastic reference volume method (ERVM) and plastic reference volume method (PRVM) for reference volume correction are presented and compared. These reference volume correction concepts are used in combination with mخ±tangent method and elastic modulus adjustment procedure to achieve converged limit load multiplier solution. These multipliers are compared with nonlinear finite element analysis results and are found to be lower bounded. Elastic reference volume method is the simplest method for reference volume correction when compared to plastic reference volume method.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Elastic and Plastic Reference Volume Approaches
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4007288
    journal fristpage11202
    journal lastpage11202
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian