| contributor author | Pietzsch, Jan B. | |
| contributor author | Zanchi, Marta G. | |
| contributor author | Linehan, John H. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:01:29Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:01:29Z | |
| date issued | 2013 | |
| identifier issn | 1932-6181 | |
| identifier other | med_7_2_021003.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152729 | |
| description abstract | The FDA 510(k) clearance process is the most common regulatory pathway for medical devices. Since 2010, it has been at the forefront of regulatory policy discussion, with a multitude of stakeholders involved in a substantive exchange of ideas about the need and opportunities for improving the process and its implementation. This article is the second in a twopart series reporting the findings of a questionnairebased assessment of recent industry experience with the 510(k) process. While the first article focused on findings directly relating to the medical device innovation process, this article reports more broadly on the findings and implications of interest to the medical community and policymakers. We discuss results in five key areas, ranging from the current performance of the 510(k) regulatory process to proposed changes and suggested performance metrics, and place identified challenges in perspective with ongoing and forthcoming FDA actions. Through the survey we also report on current trends in the amount of clinical evidence required by FDA for 510(k) devices and on the interactions between sponsors and the agency during various phases of clinical testing. The results suggest that significant opportunities exist for both industry and FDA to further improve the 510(k) process and the effectiveness of its implementation. Continued collection of process performance data can contribute to prioritizing suggested policy changes, and gauging their effects in a timely manner. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Medical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey Based Assessment of Industry Experience—Part 2: Medical Device Ecosystem and Policy | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 7 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Medical Devices | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4023131 | |
| journal fristpage | 21003 | |
| journal lastpage | 21003 | |
| identifier eissn | 1932-619X | |
| tree | Journal of Medical Devices:;2013:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |