YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Medical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey Based Assessment of Industry Experience—Part 2: Medical Device Ecosystem and Policy

    Source: Journal of Medical Devices:;2013:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002::page 21003
    Author:
    Pietzsch, Jan B.
    ,
    Zanchi, Marta G.
    ,
    Linehan, John H.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4023131
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The FDA 510(k) clearance process is the most common regulatory pathway for medical devices. Since 2010, it has been at the forefront of regulatory policy discussion, with a multitude of stakeholders involved in a substantive exchange of ideas about the need and opportunities for improving the process and its implementation. This article is the second in a twopart series reporting the findings of a questionnairebased assessment of recent industry experience with the 510(k) process. While the first article focused on findings directly relating to the medical device innovation process, this article reports more broadly on the findings and implications of interest to the medical community and policymakers. We discuss results in five key areas, ranging from the current performance of the 510(k) regulatory process to proposed changes and suggested performance metrics, and place identified challenges in perspective with ongoing and forthcoming FDA actions. Through the survey we also report on current trends in the amount of clinical evidence required by FDA for 510(k) devices and on the interactions between sponsors and the agency during various phases of clinical testing. The results suggest that significant opportunities exist for both industry and FDA to further improve the 510(k) process and the effectiveness of its implementation. Continued collection of process performance data can contribute to prioritizing suggested policy changes, and gauging their effects in a timely manner.
    • Download: (97.83Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Medical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey Based Assessment of Industry Experience—Part 2: Medical Device Ecosystem and Policy

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/152729
    Collections
    • Journal of Medical Devices

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPietzsch, Jan B.
    contributor authorZanchi, Marta G.
    contributor authorLinehan, John H.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:01:29Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:01:29Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn1932-6181
    identifier othermed_7_2_021003.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152729
    description abstractThe FDA 510(k) clearance process is the most common regulatory pathway for medical devices. Since 2010, it has been at the forefront of regulatory policy discussion, with a multitude of stakeholders involved in a substantive exchange of ideas about the need and opportunities for improving the process and its implementation. This article is the second in a twopart series reporting the findings of a questionnairebased assessment of recent industry experience with the 510(k) process. While the first article focused on findings directly relating to the medical device innovation process, this article reports more broadly on the findings and implications of interest to the medical community and policymakers. We discuss results in five key areas, ranging from the current performance of the 510(k) regulatory process to proposed changes and suggested performance metrics, and place identified challenges in perspective with ongoing and forthcoming FDA actions. Through the survey we also report on current trends in the amount of clinical evidence required by FDA for 510(k) devices and on the interactions between sponsors and the agency during various phases of clinical testing. The results suggest that significant opportunities exist for both industry and FDA to further improve the 510(k) process and the effectiveness of its implementation. Continued collection of process performance data can contribute to prioritizing suggested policy changes, and gauging their effects in a timely manner.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMedical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey Based Assessment of Industry Experience—Part 2: Medical Device Ecosystem and Policy
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Medical Devices
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4023131
    journal fristpage21003
    journal lastpage21003
    identifier eissn1932-619X
    treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2013:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian