YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Aeromechanical Control of High Speed Axial Compressor Stall and Engine Performance—Part II: Assessments of Methodology

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 005::page 51102
    Author:
    Coleman, K. L.
    ,
    McGee, III, O. G.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4006245
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A theoretical assessment was made explaining how aeromechanical feedback control can be implemented to stabilize rotating stall inception in highspeed axial compression systems. Ten aeromechanical control strategies were quantitatively evaluated based on the controltheoretic formulations and dimensionless performance analysis outlined in the Part I companion paper (McGee and Coleman, 2013, “Aeromechanical Control of HighSpeed Axial Compressor Stall and Engine Performance—Part I: ControlTheoretic Models,â€‌ ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(3), p. 031101). The maximum operating range for each aeromechanical control scheme was predicted for optimized structural parameters. Predictability and changeability in the hydrodynamic pressure, temperature, density, operability, and aeromechanical performance of dynamicallycompensated, highspeed compressor maps of corrected pressure, corrected mass flow, corrected speeds, temperature ratios, and optimum efficiency were compared for the various aeromechanical control strategies. Compared with dynamicallycompensated, lowspeed compressor maps of pressure rise and flow coefficient (Gysling and Greitzer, 1995, “Dynamic Control of Rotating Stall in Axial Flow Compressors Using Aeromechanical Feedback,â€‌ ASME J. Turbomach., 117(3), pp. 307–319; McGee et al., 2004, “Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part I: Development of Models and Metrics, ASME J. Turbomach, 126(1), pp. 52–62; Frأ©chette et al., 2004, “Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part II: Evaluation of Approaches,â€‌ ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 63–72), the present study shows that the most promising aeromechanical designs and controls for a class of highspeed compressors were the use of dynamic fluid injection. Dynamic compensations involving variable duct geometries and dynamicallyrestaggered IGV and rotor blades were predicted to yield less controllability under highspeed flow environments. The aeromechanical interaction of a flexible casing wall was predicted to be destabilizing, and thus should be avoided in highspeed compression systems as in lowspeed ones by designing sufficiently rigid structures to prevent casing ovalization or other structurallyinduced variations in tip clearance.
    • Download: (15.63Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Aeromechanical Control of High Speed Axial Compressor Stall and Engine Performance—Part II: Assessments of Methodology

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/151846
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorColeman, K. L.
    contributor authorMcGee, III, O. G.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:58:57Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:58:57Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_135_5_051102.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151846
    description abstractA theoretical assessment was made explaining how aeromechanical feedback control can be implemented to stabilize rotating stall inception in highspeed axial compression systems. Ten aeromechanical control strategies were quantitatively evaluated based on the controltheoretic formulations and dimensionless performance analysis outlined in the Part I companion paper (McGee and Coleman, 2013, “Aeromechanical Control of HighSpeed Axial Compressor Stall and Engine Performance—Part I: ControlTheoretic Models,â€‌ ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(3), p. 031101). The maximum operating range for each aeromechanical control scheme was predicted for optimized structural parameters. Predictability and changeability in the hydrodynamic pressure, temperature, density, operability, and aeromechanical performance of dynamicallycompensated, highspeed compressor maps of corrected pressure, corrected mass flow, corrected speeds, temperature ratios, and optimum efficiency were compared for the various aeromechanical control strategies. Compared with dynamicallycompensated, lowspeed compressor maps of pressure rise and flow coefficient (Gysling and Greitzer, 1995, “Dynamic Control of Rotating Stall in Axial Flow Compressors Using Aeromechanical Feedback,â€‌ ASME J. Turbomach., 117(3), pp. 307–319; McGee et al., 2004, “Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part I: Development of Models and Metrics, ASME J. Turbomach, 126(1), pp. 52–62; Frأ©chette et al., 2004, “Tailored Structural Design and Aeromechanical Control of Axial Compressor Stall—Part II: Evaluation of Approaches,â€‌ ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 63–72), the present study shows that the most promising aeromechanical designs and controls for a class of highspeed compressors were the use of dynamic fluid injection. Dynamic compensations involving variable duct geometries and dynamicallyrestaggered IGV and rotor blades were predicted to yield less controllability under highspeed flow environments. The aeromechanical interaction of a flexible casing wall was predicted to be destabilizing, and thus should be avoided in highspeed compression systems as in lowspeed ones by designing sufficiently rigid structures to prevent casing ovalization or other structurallyinduced variations in tip clearance.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAeromechanical Control of High Speed Axial Compressor Stall and Engine Performance—Part II: Assessments of Methodology
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4006245
    journal fristpage51102
    journal lastpage51102
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian