Improved Incremental J-Integral Equations for Determining Crack Growth Resistance CurvesSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 005::page 51404Author:Xian-Kui Zhu
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005945Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The J-integral resistance curve is the most important material properties in fracture mechanics that is often used for structural integrity assessment. ASTM E1820 is a commonly accepted fracture toughness test standard for measuring the critical value of J-integral at the onset of ductile fracture and J-R curve during ductile crack tearing. The recommended test procedure is the elastic unloading compliance method. For a stationary crack, the J-integral is simply calculated from the area under the load-displacement record using the η-factor equation. For a growing crack, the J-integral is calculated using the incremental equation proposed by Ernst et al. (1981, “Estimations on J-integral and Tearing Modulus T From a Single Specimen Test Record,” Fracture Mechanics: Thirteenth Conference, ASTM STP 743, pp. 476–502) to consider the crack growth correction. For the purpose of obtaining accurate J-integral values, ASTM E1820 requires small and uniform crack growth increments in a J-R curve test. In order to allow larger crack growth increments in an unloading compliance test, an improved J-integral estimation is needed. Based on the numerical integration techniques of forward rectangular, backward rectangular, and trapezoidal rules, three incremental J-integral equations are developed. It demonstrates that the current ASTM E1820 procedure is similar to the forward rectangular result, and the existing Garwood equation is similar to the backward rectangular result. The trapezoidal result has a higher accuracy than the other two, and thus it is proposed as a new formula to increase the accuracy of a J-R curve when a larger crack growth increment is used in testing. An analytic approach is then developed and used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed incremental equations using single-edge bending and compact tension specimens for different hardening materials. It is followed by an experimental evaluation using actual fracture test data for HY80 steel. The results show that the proposed incremental J-integral equations can obtain much improved results of J-R curves for larger crack growth increments and are more accurate than the present ASTM E1820 equation.
keyword(s): Electrical resistance , Fracture (Materials) , Equations , ASTM International , Approximation AND Displacement ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Xian-Kui Zhu | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:53:57Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:53:57Z | |
| date copyright | October, 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-926074#051404_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/150072 | |
| description abstract | The J-integral resistance curve is the most important material properties in fracture mechanics that is often used for structural integrity assessment. ASTM E1820 is a commonly accepted fracture toughness test standard for measuring the critical value of J-integral at the onset of ductile fracture and J-R curve during ductile crack tearing. The recommended test procedure is the elastic unloading compliance method. For a stationary crack, the J-integral is simply calculated from the area under the load-displacement record using the η-factor equation. For a growing crack, the J-integral is calculated using the incremental equation proposed by Ernst et al. (1981, “Estimations on J-integral and Tearing Modulus T From a Single Specimen Test Record,” Fracture Mechanics: Thirteenth Conference, ASTM STP 743, pp. 476–502) to consider the crack growth correction. For the purpose of obtaining accurate J-integral values, ASTM E1820 requires small and uniform crack growth increments in a J-R curve test. In order to allow larger crack growth increments in an unloading compliance test, an improved J-integral estimation is needed. Based on the numerical integration techniques of forward rectangular, backward rectangular, and trapezoidal rules, three incremental J-integral equations are developed. It demonstrates that the current ASTM E1820 procedure is similar to the forward rectangular result, and the existing Garwood equation is similar to the backward rectangular result. The trapezoidal result has a higher accuracy than the other two, and thus it is proposed as a new formula to increase the accuracy of a J-R curve when a larger crack growth increment is used in testing. An analytic approach is then developed and used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed incremental equations using single-edge bending and compact tension specimens for different hardening materials. It is followed by an experimental evaluation using actual fracture test data for HY80 steel. The results show that the proposed incremental J-integral equations can obtain much improved results of J-R curves for larger crack growth increments and are more accurate than the present ASTM E1820 equation. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Improved Incremental J-Integral Equations for Determining Crack Growth Resistance Curves | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 5 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4005945 | |
| journal fristpage | 51404 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Electrical resistance | |
| keywords | Fracture (Materials) | |
| keywords | Equations | |
| keywords | ASTM International | |
| keywords | Approximation AND Displacement | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 005 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |