YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Two Control Methods for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments

    Source: Journal of Medical Devices:;2012:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002::page 21005
    Author:
    Chunman Fan
    ,
    Hélène Clogenson
    ,
    Paul Breedveld
    ,
    John J. van den Dobbelsteen
    ,
    Jenny Dankelman
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4006544
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Laparoscopic surgery is performed with long and slender instruments through one or several incisions in the abdominal wall. Steerable instruments with flexible distal tips have been developed for improving the ease of access to anatomic structures. However, the development of an intuitive and efficient control method for such steerable instruments remains a challenge. To determine which interface are most intuitive and effective to control steerable instruments, the current study evaluates the performance of novices in orienting the tip of a steerable laparoscopic forceps using thumb control or wrist control. Using two steerable instruments, one controlled by the thumb and the other by the wrist, 24 novices were divided into two groups that had to carry out an experimental task in an EndoTrainer with one of the two instruments. The participants had to orient the tip of the instrument relative to five targets that were presented in a random order. After a break, the participants switched to a second measurement session with the other instrument, followed by a third measurement session with the first instrument. Each participant performed the task 240 times over the three measurement sessions. The performance was assessed by measuring the performance time, using a questionnaire and grading the work load. The performance time showed a significant learning curve for each control method. The shortest performance time was recorded during the third session with both control methods (42.7 s for thumb control and 44.6 s for wrist control). A significant difference in the performance time was observed in the second session (p <0.02) but not in the first and third session. The questionnaire showed that most participants had a preference for thumb control. After a brief training period, thumb control and wrist control did not reveal significant differences in task performance. However, thumb control was strongly preferred by the participants due to the perceptive feeling in performance.
    keyword(s): Instrumentation , Surgery , Surgical tools AND Stress ,
    • Download: (1.884Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Two Control Methods for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/149921
    Collections
    • Journal of Medical Devices

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChunman Fan
    contributor authorHélène Clogenson
    contributor authorPaul Breedveld
    contributor authorJohn J. van den Dobbelsteen
    contributor authorJenny Dankelman
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:53:33Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:53:33Z
    date copyrightJune, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1932-6181
    identifier otherJMDOA4-28023#021005_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149921
    description abstractLaparoscopic surgery is performed with long and slender instruments through one or several incisions in the abdominal wall. Steerable instruments with flexible distal tips have been developed for improving the ease of access to anatomic structures. However, the development of an intuitive and efficient control method for such steerable instruments remains a challenge. To determine which interface are most intuitive and effective to control steerable instruments, the current study evaluates the performance of novices in orienting the tip of a steerable laparoscopic forceps using thumb control or wrist control. Using two steerable instruments, one controlled by the thumb and the other by the wrist, 24 novices were divided into two groups that had to carry out an experimental task in an EndoTrainer with one of the two instruments. The participants had to orient the tip of the instrument relative to five targets that were presented in a random order. After a break, the participants switched to a second measurement session with the other instrument, followed by a third measurement session with the first instrument. Each participant performed the task 240 times over the three measurement sessions. The performance was assessed by measuring the performance time, using a questionnaire and grading the work load. The performance time showed a significant learning curve for each control method. The shortest performance time was recorded during the third session with both control methods (42.7 s for thumb control and 44.6 s for wrist control). A significant difference in the performance time was observed in the second session (p <0.02) but not in the first and third session. The questionnaire showed that most participants had a preference for thumb control. After a brief training period, thumb control and wrist control did not reveal significant differences in task performance. However, thumb control was strongly preferred by the participants due to the perceptive feeling in performance.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Two Control Methods for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Medical Devices
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4006544
    journal fristpage21005
    identifier eissn1932-619X
    keywordsInstrumentation
    keywordsSurgery
    keywordsSurgical tools AND Stress
    treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2012:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian