YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002::page 21005
    Author:
    Jami J. Shah
    ,
    Roger E. Millsap
    ,
    Jay Woodward
    ,
    S. M. Smith
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4005594
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A number of cognitive skills relevant to conceptual design were identified previously. They include divergent thinking (DT), visual thinking (VT), spatial reasoning (SR), qualitative reasoning (QR), and problem formulation (PF). A battery of standardized tests is being developed for these design skills. This paper focuses only on the divergent thinking test. This particular test has been given to over 500 engineering students and a smaller number of practicing engineers. It is designed to evaluate four direct measures (fluency, flexibility, originality, and quality) and four indirect measures (abstractability, afixability, detailability, and decomplexability). The eight questions on the test overlap in some measures and the responses can be used to evaluate several measures independently (e.g., fluency and originality can be evaluated separately from the same idea set). The data on the twenty-three measured variables were factor analyzed using both exploratory and confirmatory procedures. A four-factor solution with correlated (oblique) factors was deemed the best available solution after examining solutions with more factors. The indirect measures did not appear to correlate strongly either among themselves or with the other direct measures. The four-factor structure was then taken into a confirmatory factor analytic procedure that adjusted for the missing data. It was found to provide a reasonable fit. Estimated correlations among the four factors (F) ranged from a high of 0.32 for F1 and F2 to a low of 0.06 for F3 and F4. All factor loadings were statistically significant.
    keyword(s): Design , Plasticity AND Creativity ,
    • Download: (1.027Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/149823
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJami J. Shah
    contributor authorRoger E. Millsap
    contributor authorJay Woodward
    contributor authorS. M. Smith
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:53:17Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:53:17Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27959#021005_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149823
    description abstractA number of cognitive skills relevant to conceptual design were identified previously. They include divergent thinking (DT), visual thinking (VT), spatial reasoning (SR), qualitative reasoning (QR), and problem formulation (PF). A battery of standardized tests is being developed for these design skills. This paper focuses only on the divergent thinking test. This particular test has been given to over 500 engineering students and a smaller number of practicing engineers. It is designed to evaluate four direct measures (fluency, flexibility, originality, and quality) and four indirect measures (abstractability, afixability, detailability, and decomplexability). The eight questions on the test overlap in some measures and the responses can be used to evaluate several measures independently (e.g., fluency and originality can be evaluated separately from the same idea set). The data on the twenty-three measured variables were factor analyzed using both exploratory and confirmatory procedures. A four-factor solution with correlated (oblique) factors was deemed the best available solution after examining solutions with more factors. The indirect measures did not appear to correlate strongly either among themselves or with the other direct measures. The four-factor structure was then taken into a confirmatory factor analytic procedure that adjusted for the missing data. It was found to provide a reasonable fit. Estimated correlations among the four factors (F) ranged from a high of 0.32 for F1 and F2 to a low of 0.06 for F3 and F4. All factor loadings were statistically significant.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleApplied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4005594
    journal fristpage21005
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsPlasticity AND Creativity
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian