Closure to “Discussion of ‘Friction Numbers and Viscous Dissipation Heating for Laminar Flows of Water in Microtubes’” (2008, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130, p. 082405)Source: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 011::page 116001DOI: 10.1115/1.4006212Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The derivation in our paper is for liquid (water) flow in a microtube, with a slip at the wall. For this problem, in the paper by El-Genk and Yang, a stationary microlayer, δ, whose thickness depends of the jump distance, β, separates the fluid flow from the wall of the microtube. In fact, the boundary of the flow field near the wall (r = R − δ) moves with the slip velocity relative to the stationary adiabatic wall. Under this condition, the viscous dissipation and, hence, the temperature gradient at the wall would be negligible, justifying omitting of the volumetric conduction term in Eq. (3) in the commentary offered by Asako. With no-slip at the wall, viscous dissipation could be important in some cases, e.g., for high viscosity fluids and gasses, but not when the effect on the fluid temperature is small. This is certainly truer as Reynolds number increases.
keyword(s): Friction , Heat transfer , Laminar flow , Energy dissipation , Water AND Heating ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Mohamed S. El-Genk | |
| contributor author | In-Hwan Yang | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:51:53Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:51:53Z | |
| date copyright | November, 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-1481 | |
| identifier other | JHTRAO-926057#116001_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149308 | |
| description abstract | The derivation in our paper is for liquid (water) flow in a microtube, with a slip at the wall. For this problem, in the paper by El-Genk and Yang, a stationary microlayer, δ, whose thickness depends of the jump distance, β, separates the fluid flow from the wall of the microtube. In fact, the boundary of the flow field near the wall (r = R − δ) moves with the slip velocity relative to the stationary adiabatic wall. Under this condition, the viscous dissipation and, hence, the temperature gradient at the wall would be negligible, justifying omitting of the volumetric conduction term in Eq. (3) in the commentary offered by Asako. With no-slip at the wall, viscous dissipation could be important in some cases, e.g., for high viscosity fluids and gasses, but not when the effect on the fluid temperature is small. This is certainly truer as Reynolds number increases. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Closure to “Discussion of ‘Friction Numbers and Viscous Dissipation Heating for Laminar Flows of Water in Microtubes’” (2008, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 130, p. 082405) | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Heat Transfer | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4006212 | |
| journal fristpage | 116001 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8943 | |
| keywords | Friction | |
| keywords | Heat transfer | |
| keywords | Laminar flow | |
| keywords | Energy dissipation | |
| keywords | Water AND Heating | |
| tree | Journal of Heat Transfer:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |