YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    What is the Small Parameter ε in the Chapman-Enskog Expansion of the Lattice Boltzmann Method?

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 001::page 11401
    Author:
    Minoru Watari
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4005682
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is shown to be equivalent to the Navier-Stokes equations by applying the Chapman-Enskog (C-E) expansion, which has been established by pioneer researchers. However, it is still difficult for elementary researchers. There is no clear explanation of the small parameter ε used in the C-E expansion. There are several expressions for the viscosity coefficient; some are unclear on the relationship with ε. There are two expressions on the LBM evolution equation. Elementary researchers are perplexed as to which is correct. The LBM achieves second order accuracy by including the numerical viscosity within the physical viscosity. This is not only difficult for elementary researchers to understand but also sometimes leads senior researchers into making errors. The C-E expansion of the LBM was thoroughly reviewed and is presented as a self-contained form in this paper. It is natural to use the time step Δt as ε. The viscosity coefficient is expressed as μ∝Δxc(τ − 1/2). The viscosity relationship and the second order accuracy were confirmed by numerical simulations. The difference in the two expressions on the LBM evolution is simply one of perspective. They are identical. The difference between the relaxation parameter τD for the discrete Boltzmann equation and τ for the LBM was discussed. While τD is a quantity of time, τ is genuinely nondimensional, which is sometimes overlooked.
    keyword(s): Viscosity , Computer simulation , Equations , Lattice Boltzmann methods , Relaxation (Physics) , Simulation results AND Errors ,
    • Download: (343.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      What is the Small Parameter ε in the Chapman-Enskog Expansion of the Lattice Boltzmann Method?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/149203
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMinoru Watari
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:51:35Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:51:35Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27513#011401_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149203
    description abstractThe lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is shown to be equivalent to the Navier-Stokes equations by applying the Chapman-Enskog (C-E) expansion, which has been established by pioneer researchers. However, it is still difficult for elementary researchers. There is no clear explanation of the small parameter ε used in the C-E expansion. There are several expressions for the viscosity coefficient; some are unclear on the relationship with ε. There are two expressions on the LBM evolution equation. Elementary researchers are perplexed as to which is correct. The LBM achieves second order accuracy by including the numerical viscosity within the physical viscosity. This is not only difficult for elementary researchers to understand but also sometimes leads senior researchers into making errors. The C-E expansion of the LBM was thoroughly reviewed and is presented as a self-contained form in this paper. It is natural to use the time step Δt as ε. The viscosity coefficient is expressed as μ∝Δxc(τ − 1/2). The viscosity relationship and the second order accuracy were confirmed by numerical simulations. The difference in the two expressions on the LBM evolution is simply one of perspective. They are identical. The difference between the relaxation parameter τD for the discrete Boltzmann equation and τ for the LBM was discussed. While τD is a quantity of time, τ is genuinely nondimensional, which is sometimes overlooked.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleWhat is the Small Parameter ε in the Chapman-Enskog Expansion of the Lattice Boltzmann Method?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4005682
    journal fristpage11401
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsViscosity
    keywordsComputer simulation
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsLattice Boltzmann methods
    keywordsRelaxation (Physics)
    keywordsSimulation results AND Errors
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian