YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Biomechanical Effect of Torsion on Humeral Shaft Repair Techniques for Completed Pathological Fractures

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002::page 24501
    Author:
    Ahmed Al-Jahwari
    ,
    Emil H. Schemitsch
    ,
    Jay S. Wunder
    ,
    Rad Zdero
    ,
    Peter C. Ferguson
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4005696
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In the presence of a tumor defect, completed humeral shaft fractures continue to be a major surgical challenge since there is no “gold standard” treatment. This is due, in part, to the fact that only one prior biomechanical study exists on the matter, but which only compared 2 repair methods. The current authors measured the humeral torsional performance of 5 fixation constructs for completed pathological fractures. In 40 artificial humeri, a 2-cm hemi-cylindrical cortical defect with a transverse fracture was created in the lateral cortex. Specimens were divided into 5 different constructs and tested in torsion. Construct A was a broad 10-hole 4.5-mm dynamic compression plate (DCP). Construct B was the same as A except that the screw holes and the tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into soft cement. Construct C was the same as A except that the canal and tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into dry cement. Construct D was a locked intramedullary nail inserted in the antegrade direction. Construct E was the same as D except that bone cement filled the defect. For torsional stiffness, construct C (4.45 ± 0.20 Nm/deg) was not different than B or E (p > 0.16), but was higher than A and D (p < 0.001). For failure torque, construct C achieved a higher failure torque (69.65 ± 5.35 Nm) than other groups (p < 0.001). For the failure angle, there were no differences between plating constructs A to C (p ≥ 0.11), except for B versus C (p < 0.05), or between nailing groups D versus E (p = 0.97), however, all plating groups had smaller failure angles than both nailing groups (p < 0.05). For failure energy, construct C (17.97 ± 3.59 J) had a higher value than other groups (p < 0.005), except for A (p = 0.057). Torsional failure always occurred in the bone in the classic “spiral” pattern. Construct C provided the highest torsional stability for a completed pathological humeral shaft fracture.
    keyword(s): Torque , Maintenance , Torsion , Bone , Fracture (Process) , Failure , Stiffness , Biomechanics , Cements (Adhesives) AND Screws ,
    • Download: (693.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Biomechanical Effect of Torsion on Humeral Shaft Repair Techniques for Completed Pathological Fractures

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/148291
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAhmed Al-Jahwari
    contributor authorEmil H. Schemitsch
    contributor authorJay S. Wunder
    contributor authorRad Zdero
    contributor authorPeter C. Ferguson
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:48:36Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:48:36Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-28990#024501_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148291
    description abstractIn the presence of a tumor defect, completed humeral shaft fractures continue to be a major surgical challenge since there is no “gold standard” treatment. This is due, in part, to the fact that only one prior biomechanical study exists on the matter, but which only compared 2 repair methods. The current authors measured the humeral torsional performance of 5 fixation constructs for completed pathological fractures. In 40 artificial humeri, a 2-cm hemi-cylindrical cortical defect with a transverse fracture was created in the lateral cortex. Specimens were divided into 5 different constructs and tested in torsion. Construct A was a broad 10-hole 4.5-mm dynamic compression plate (DCP). Construct B was the same as A except that the screw holes and the tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into soft cement. Construct C was the same as A except that the canal and tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into dry cement. Construct D was a locked intramedullary nail inserted in the antegrade direction. Construct E was the same as D except that bone cement filled the defect. For torsional stiffness, construct C (4.45 ± 0.20 Nm/deg) was not different than B or E (p > 0.16), but was higher than A and D (p < 0.001). For failure torque, construct C achieved a higher failure torque (69.65 ± 5.35 Nm) than other groups (p < 0.001). For the failure angle, there were no differences between plating constructs A to C (p ≥ 0.11), except for B versus C (p < 0.05), or between nailing groups D versus E (p = 0.97), however, all plating groups had smaller failure angles than both nailing groups (p < 0.05). For failure energy, construct C (17.97 ± 3.59 J) had a higher value than other groups (p < 0.005), except for A (p = 0.057). Torsional failure always occurred in the bone in the classic “spiral” pattern. Construct C provided the highest torsional stability for a completed pathological humeral shaft fracture.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Biomechanical Effect of Torsion on Humeral Shaft Repair Techniques for Completed Pathological Fractures
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4005696
    journal fristpage24501
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsTorque
    keywordsMaintenance
    keywordsTorsion
    keywordsBone
    keywordsFracture (Process)
    keywordsFailure
    keywordsStiffness
    keywordsBiomechanics
    keywordsCements (Adhesives) AND Screws
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian