A Preliminary Biomechanical Study of Cyclic Preconditioning Effects on Canine Cadaveric Whole FemursSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 009::page 94502Author:Rad Zdero
,
Chris H. Gallimore
,
Alison J. McConnell
,
Harshita Patel
,
Rosane Nisenbaum
,
Golam Morshed
,
Henry Koo
,
Michael D. McKee
,
Emil H. Schemitsch
,
Habiba Bougherara
DOI: 10.1115/1.4007249Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Biomechanical preconditioning of biological specimens by cyclic loading is routinely done presumably to stabilize properties prior to the main phase of a study. However, no prior studies have actually measured these effects for whole bone of any kind. The aim of this study, therefore, was to quantify these effects for whole bones. Fourteen matched pairs of fresh-frozen intact cadaveric canine femurs were sinusoidally loaded in 4-point bending from 50 N to 300 N at 1 Hz for 25 cycles. All femurs were tested in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) bending planes. Bending stiffness (i.e., slope of the force-vs-displacement curve) and linearity R2 (i.e., coefficient of determination) of each loading cycle were measured and compared statistically to determine the effect of limb side, cycle number, and bending plane. Stiffnesses rose from 809.7 to 867.7 N/mm (AP, left), 847.3 to 915.6 N/mm (AP, right), 829.2 to 892.5 N/mm (AP, combined), 538.7 to 580.4 N/mm (ML, left), 568.9 to 613.8 N/mm (ML, right), and 553.8 to 597.1 N/mm (ML, combined). Linearity R2 rose from 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, left), 0.97 to 0.99 (AP, right), 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, combined), 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, left), 0.94 to 0.98 (ML, right), and 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, combined). Stiffness and linearity R2 versus cycle number were well-described by exponential curves whose values leveled off, respectively, starting at 12 and 5 cycles. For stiffness, there were no statistical differences for left versus right femurs (p = 0.166), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p < 0.0001). Similarly, for linearity, no statistical differences were noted due to limb side (p = 0.533), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p = 0.006). A minimum of 12 preconditioning cycles was needed to fully stabilize both the stiffness and linearity of the canine femurs. This is the first study to measure the effects of mechanical preconditioning on whole bones, having some practical implications on research practices.
keyword(s): Biomechanics , Bone , Cycles , Displacement , Force , Stiffness , Stress AND Mechanical testing ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Rad Zdero | |
| contributor author | Chris H. Gallimore | |
| contributor author | Alison J. McConnell | |
| contributor author | Harshita Patel | |
| contributor author | Rosane Nisenbaum | |
| contributor author | Golam Morshed | |
| contributor author | Henry Koo | |
| contributor author | Michael D. McKee | |
| contributor author | Emil H. Schemitsch | |
| contributor author | Habiba Bougherara | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:48:24Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:48:24Z | |
| date copyright | September, 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-29001#094502_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148216 | |
| description abstract | Biomechanical preconditioning of biological specimens by cyclic loading is routinely done presumably to stabilize properties prior to the main phase of a study. However, no prior studies have actually measured these effects for whole bone of any kind. The aim of this study, therefore, was to quantify these effects for whole bones. Fourteen matched pairs of fresh-frozen intact cadaveric canine femurs were sinusoidally loaded in 4-point bending from 50 N to 300 N at 1 Hz for 25 cycles. All femurs were tested in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) bending planes. Bending stiffness (i.e., slope of the force-vs-displacement curve) and linearity R2 (i.e., coefficient of determination) of each loading cycle were measured and compared statistically to determine the effect of limb side, cycle number, and bending plane. Stiffnesses rose from 809.7 to 867.7 N/mm (AP, left), 847.3 to 915.6 N/mm (AP, right), 829.2 to 892.5 N/mm (AP, combined), 538.7 to 580.4 N/mm (ML, left), 568.9 to 613.8 N/mm (ML, right), and 553.8 to 597.1 N/mm (ML, combined). Linearity R2 rose from 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, left), 0.97 to 0.99 (AP, right), 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, combined), 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, left), 0.94 to 0.98 (ML, right), and 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, combined). Stiffness and linearity R2 versus cycle number were well-described by exponential curves whose values leveled off, respectively, starting at 12 and 5 cycles. For stiffness, there were no statistical differences for left versus right femurs (p = 0.166), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p < 0.0001). Similarly, for linearity, no statistical differences were noted due to limb side (p = 0.533), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p = 0.006). A minimum of 12 preconditioning cycles was needed to fully stabilize both the stiffness and linearity of the canine femurs. This is the first study to measure the effects of mechanical preconditioning on whole bones, having some practical implications on research practices. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Preliminary Biomechanical Study of Cyclic Preconditioning Effects on Canine Cadaveric Whole Femurs | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4007249 | |
| journal fristpage | 94502 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Biomechanics | |
| keywords | Bone | |
| keywords | Cycles | |
| keywords | Displacement | |
| keywords | Force | |
| keywords | Stiffness | |
| keywords | Stress AND Mechanical testing | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |