YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Secondary-Drop-Breakup Simulation Integrated With Fuel-Breakup Simulation Near Injector Outlet

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 008::page 81302
    Author:
    Eiji Ishii
    ,
    Masanori Ishikawa
    ,
    Yoshihiro Sukegawa
    ,
    Hiroshi Yamada
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4004764
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The fuel spray of an injector for automobile engines contains multiscale free surfaces: liquid films formed at the fuel-injector outlet, ligaments generated by liquid-film breakup, and droplets generated from the ligaments within the secondary-drop-breakup region. To simulate these multiscale free surfaces, we developed a method that combines two types of simulation. The liquid-film breakup near the injector outlet was simulated by using a particle method, and the secondary-drop breakup after the liquid-film breakup was simulated by using a discrete droplet model (DDM). The injection conditions of DDM were the distributions of droplet diameters and velocities calculated in the liquid-film-breakup simulation. We applied our method to simulate the spray from a collision-type fuel injector. The simulated liquid-film breakup near the injector outlet and behavior of the secondary-drop breakup qualitatively agreed with measurements. Furthermore, the errors of the mean droplet diameters between the simulations and the measurements were less than 12%. This shows that our method is effective for fuel spray simulation.
    keyword(s): Particulate matter , Fuels , Simulation , Drops , Ejectors , Sprays , Liquid films , Measurement , Collisions (Physics) , Engineering simulation , Nozzles AND Fuel injectors ,
    • Download: (3.022Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Secondary-Drop-Breakup Simulation Integrated With Fuel-Breakup Simulation Near Injector Outlet

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/146304
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEiji Ishii
    contributor authorMasanori Ishikawa
    contributor authorYoshihiro Sukegawa
    contributor authorHiroshi Yamada
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:44:15Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:44:15Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27482#081302_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/146304
    description abstractThe fuel spray of an injector for automobile engines contains multiscale free surfaces: liquid films formed at the fuel-injector outlet, ligaments generated by liquid-film breakup, and droplets generated from the ligaments within the secondary-drop-breakup region. To simulate these multiscale free surfaces, we developed a method that combines two types of simulation. The liquid-film breakup near the injector outlet was simulated by using a particle method, and the secondary-drop breakup after the liquid-film breakup was simulated by using a discrete droplet model (DDM). The injection conditions of DDM were the distributions of droplet diameters and velocities calculated in the liquid-film-breakup simulation. We applied our method to simulate the spray from a collision-type fuel injector. The simulated liquid-film breakup near the injector outlet and behavior of the secondary-drop breakup qualitatively agreed with measurements. Furthermore, the errors of the mean droplet diameters between the simulations and the measurements were less than 12%. This shows that our method is effective for fuel spray simulation.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSecondary-Drop-Breakup Simulation Integrated With Fuel-Breakup Simulation Near Injector Outlet
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4004764
    journal fristpage81302
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsParticulate matter
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsSimulation
    keywordsDrops
    keywordsEjectors
    keywordsSprays
    keywordsLiquid films
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsCollisions (Physics)
    keywordsEngineering simulation
    keywordsNozzles AND Fuel injectors
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian