A Probabilistic Secondary Flow System Design Process for Gas Turbine EnginesSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 009::page 92502DOI: 10.1115/1.4002829Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Gas turbine engine secondary flow systems are sensitive to variation in part dimensions, clearances, flow coefficients, swirl ratios, head loss factors, tolerances, boundary conditions, etc. This paper reveals a process and software application, which embodies the process, wherein both offer a measurable contribution to secondary airflow system reliability. The probabilistic methodology is empirically validated by (1) applying it to an engine component that failed in a validation test and (2) demonstrating that a multiple order sensitivity analysis performed during detailed design was unable to detect a failure mode while a probabilistic analysis revealed a small yet significant risk of failure. Therefore, a secondary flow analyst does not have a justifiable reason to be highly confident of a design qualified by a first, second, or higher order sensitivity analysis. The last example empirically demonstrates the compatibility of optimization techniques with probabilistic methods (as part of the process) to quantify the likelihood of failure and reveal an optimized design space of key characteristics, where risk is eliminated and the effects of variation are controlled. Trade study analysis is more valuable if it includes a quantitative evaluation of the effects of variation on alternate designs and the response to failure modes. A key feature of the software application is a relational database with the capability to configure and effectively manage flow networks in many forms including a status model, failure modes of the status model, multiple alternative designs, as well as failure modes specific to an alternative design.
keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Design , Gas turbines , Failure , Uncertainty , Engines , Probability , Cooling , Sensitivity analysis , Computer software AND Relational databases ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Douglas L. Ramerth | |
| contributor author | Alexander V. MirzaMoghadam | |
| contributor author | Ashish Kiratsingh | |
| contributor author | Gaurav Banda | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:43:30Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:43:30Z | |
| date copyright | September, 2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-27172#092502_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145948 | |
| description abstract | Gas turbine engine secondary flow systems are sensitive to variation in part dimensions, clearances, flow coefficients, swirl ratios, head loss factors, tolerances, boundary conditions, etc. This paper reveals a process and software application, which embodies the process, wherein both offer a measurable contribution to secondary airflow system reliability. The probabilistic methodology is empirically validated by (1) applying it to an engine component that failed in a validation test and (2) demonstrating that a multiple order sensitivity analysis performed during detailed design was unable to detect a failure mode while a probabilistic analysis revealed a small yet significant risk of failure. Therefore, a secondary flow analyst does not have a justifiable reason to be highly confident of a design qualified by a first, second, or higher order sensitivity analysis. The last example empirically demonstrates the compatibility of optimization techniques with probabilistic methods (as part of the process) to quantify the likelihood of failure and reveal an optimized design space of key characteristics, where risk is eliminated and the effects of variation are controlled. Trade study analysis is more valuable if it includes a quantitative evaluation of the effects of variation on alternate designs and the response to failure modes. A key feature of the software application is a relational database with the capability to configure and effectively manage flow networks in many forms including a status model, failure modes of the status model, multiple alternative designs, as well as failure modes specific to an alternative design. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Probabilistic Secondary Flow System Design Process for Gas Turbine Engines | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 133 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4002829 | |
| journal fristpage | 92502 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Gas turbines | |
| keywords | Failure | |
| keywords | Uncertainty | |
| keywords | Engines | |
| keywords | Probability | |
| keywords | Cooling | |
| keywords | Sensitivity analysis | |
| keywords | Computer software AND Relational databases | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |