Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose SupportsSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 004::page 41302DOI: 10.1115/1.4001700Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This paper presents simulations of a loosely supported cantilever tube subjected to turbulence and fluidelastic instability forces. Several time domain fluid force models are presented to simulate the damping-controlled fluidelastic instability mechanism in tube arrays. These models include a negative damping model based on the Connors equation, fluid force coefficient-based models (, 1983, “Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow. Part 1: Theory,” Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 105, pp. 51–58; and , 1981, “Fluid Elastic Vibration of Tube Array in Cross Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 77, pp. 19–37), and two semi-analytical models ( and , 1984, “An Improved Mathematical Model for the Stability of Cylinder Rows Subjected to Cross-Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 97(4), pp. 615–640; and , 1982, “A Theoretical Model for the Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 104, pp. 104–147). Time domain modeling and implementation challenges for each of these theories were discussed. For each model, the flow velocity and the support clearance were varied. Special attention was paid to the tube/support interaction parameters that affect wear, such as impact forces and normal work rate. As the prediction of the linear threshold varies depending on the model utilized, the nonlinear response also differs. The investigated models exhibit similar response characteristics for the lift response. The greatest differences were seen in the prediction of the drag response, the impact force level, and the normal work rate. Simulation results show that the Connors-based model consistently underestimates the response and the tube/support interaction parameters for the loose support case.
keyword(s): Force , Flow (Dynamics) , Levers , Drag (Fluid dynamics) , Clearances (Engineering) , Damping , Engineering simulation , Equations , Stability AND Fluids ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Marwan Hassan | |
| contributor author | Achraf Hossen | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:40:31Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:40:31Z | |
| date copyright | August, 2010 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-28534#041302_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/144662 | |
| description abstract | This paper presents simulations of a loosely supported cantilever tube subjected to turbulence and fluidelastic instability forces. Several time domain fluid force models are presented to simulate the damping-controlled fluidelastic instability mechanism in tube arrays. These models include a negative damping model based on the Connors equation, fluid force coefficient-based models (, 1983, “Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow. Part 1: Theory,” Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 105, pp. 51–58; and , 1981, “Fluid Elastic Vibration of Tube Array in Cross Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 77, pp. 19–37), and two semi-analytical models ( and , 1984, “An Improved Mathematical Model for the Stability of Cylinder Rows Subjected to Cross-Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 97(4), pp. 615–640; and , 1982, “A Theoretical Model for the Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 104, pp. 104–147). Time domain modeling and implementation challenges for each of these theories were discussed. For each model, the flow velocity and the support clearance were varied. Special attention was paid to the tube/support interaction parameters that affect wear, such as impact forces and normal work rate. As the prediction of the linear threshold varies depending on the model utilized, the nonlinear response also differs. The investigated models exhibit similar response characteristics for the lift response. The greatest differences were seen in the prediction of the drag response, the impact force level, and the normal work rate. Simulation results show that the Connors-based model consistently underestimates the response and the tube/support interaction parameters for the loose support case. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 132 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4001700 | |
| journal fristpage | 41302 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Force | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Levers | |
| keywords | Drag (Fluid dynamics) | |
| keywords | Clearances (Engineering) | |
| keywords | Damping | |
| keywords | Engineering simulation | |
| keywords | Equations | |
| keywords | Stability AND Fluids | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |