Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD ApproachSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 012::page 122803DOI: 10.1115/1.4001294Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of re-entrant bowl geometry on both engine performance and combustion efficiency in a direct injection (DI), turbocharged diesel engine for heavy-duty applications. The piston bowl design is one of the most important factors that affect the air–fuel mixing and the subsequent combustion and pollutant formation processes in a DI diesel engine. The bowl geometry and dimensions, such as the pip region, bowl lip area, and toroidal radius, are all known to have an effect on the in-cylinder mixing and combustion processes. Based on the idea of enhancing diffusion combustion at the later stage of the combustion period, three different bowl geometries, namely, bowl 1 (baseline), bowl 2, and bowl 3 were selected and investigated. All the other relevant parameters, namely, compression ratio, maximum diameter of the bowl, squish clearance and injection rate were kept constant. A commercial CFD code STAR-CD was used to model the in-cylinder flows and combustion process, and experimental results of the baseline bowl were used to validate the numerical model. The simulation results show that, bowl 3 enhance the turbulence and hence results in better air-fuel mixing among all three bowls in a DI diesel engine. As a result, the indicated specific fuel consumption and soot emission reduced although the NOx emission is increased owing to better mixing and a faster combustion process. Globally, since the reduction in soot is larger (−46% as regards baseline) than the increase in NOx (+15% as regards baseline), it can be concluded that bowl 3 is the best trade-off between performance and emissions.
keyword(s): Combustion , Fuels , Turbulence , Engines , Computational fluid dynamics , Cylinders , Diesel engines , Geometry , Soot , Emissions , Flow (Dynamics) , Pressure , Compression , Pistons , Sprays , Stress AND Computation ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | S. Pasupathy Venkateswaran | |
| contributor author | G. Nagarajan | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:37:26Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:37:26Z | |
| date copyright | December, 2010 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-27147#122803_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143036 | |
| description abstract | The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of re-entrant bowl geometry on both engine performance and combustion efficiency in a direct injection (DI), turbocharged diesel engine for heavy-duty applications. The piston bowl design is one of the most important factors that affect the air–fuel mixing and the subsequent combustion and pollutant formation processes in a DI diesel engine. The bowl geometry and dimensions, such as the pip region, bowl lip area, and toroidal radius, are all known to have an effect on the in-cylinder mixing and combustion processes. Based on the idea of enhancing diffusion combustion at the later stage of the combustion period, three different bowl geometries, namely, bowl 1 (baseline), bowl 2, and bowl 3 were selected and investigated. All the other relevant parameters, namely, compression ratio, maximum diameter of the bowl, squish clearance and injection rate were kept constant. A commercial CFD code STAR-CD was used to model the in-cylinder flows and combustion process, and experimental results of the baseline bowl were used to validate the numerical model. The simulation results show that, bowl 3 enhance the turbulence and hence results in better air-fuel mixing among all three bowls in a DI diesel engine. As a result, the indicated specific fuel consumption and soot emission reduced although the NOx emission is increased owing to better mixing and a faster combustion process. Globally, since the reduction in soot is larger (−46% as regards baseline) than the increase in NOx (+15% as regards baseline), it can be concluded that bowl 3 is the best trade-off between performance and emissions. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD Approach | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 132 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4001294 | |
| journal fristpage | 122803 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Combustion | |
| keywords | Fuels | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Engines | |
| keywords | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| keywords | Cylinders | |
| keywords | Diesel engines | |
| keywords | Geometry | |
| keywords | Soot | |
| keywords | Emissions | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Compression | |
| keywords | Pistons | |
| keywords | Sprays | |
| keywords | Stress AND Computation | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |