YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Storage Stability of Biodiesel and Ultralow Sulfur Diesel Fuel Blends

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 004::page 41801
    Author:
    M. Farahani
    ,
    M. P. Turingia
    ,
    B. D. Tucker
    ,
    D. J. Y. S. Pagé
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4000177
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A biodiesel storage stability study was conducted on ultralow sulfur diesel fuel (ULSDF) and three biodiesel basestocks (B100) and fuel blends (B2, B5, B10, and B20). The storage stability study consisted in measuring and monitoring the changes in acid number (AN, ASTM D664-04) and kinematic viscosity (ASTM D445) over 10 months with different samples stored at 5°C, 40°C, and cyclic thermal conditions. Among the three biodiesel base fuels (B100) studied, Bio1 (from tallow) and Bio2 (from yellow grease) showed the largest increase in AN throughout 6 months of storage at 40°C while Bio3 (from canola) showed the least increase in AN. Bio1, Bio2, and Bio3 samples stored at 5°C showed very little increases in acidity after 10 month, while samples stored under thermal cycling conditions were comparable to those stored at 40°C. The AN for ULSDF and all blends between B2 and B20 for Bio1, Bio2 and Bio3 remained in the range of 0.1–0.3 mg KOH g−1 for all temperatures and throughout the storage period well below the ASTM 6751 limit of 0.5 mg KOH g−1. All blends showed a lower increase in AN than any of the base fuels. All fuels were submitted to accelerated oxidative testing, which also revealed a greater stability of the blends than for the biodiesel base fuels. Bio1 (from tallow) blends displayed a greater stability under accelerated oxidative testing while Bio2 (from yellow grease) displayed the least. The impact of storage conditions on the viscosities of all the base fuels and blends was negligible.
    keyword(s): Stability , Fuels , Storage , Biodiesel , Diesel , Sulfur AND Viscosity ,
    • Download: (295.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Storage Stability of Biodiesel and Ultralow Sulfur Diesel Fuel Blends

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/140337
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Farahani
    contributor authorM. P. Turingia
    contributor authorB. D. Tucker
    contributor authorD. J. Y. S. Pagé
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:32:23Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:32:23Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherJERTD2-26566#041801_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/140337
    description abstractA biodiesel storage stability study was conducted on ultralow sulfur diesel fuel (ULSDF) and three biodiesel basestocks (B100) and fuel blends (B2, B5, B10, and B20). The storage stability study consisted in measuring and monitoring the changes in acid number (AN, ASTM D664-04) and kinematic viscosity (ASTM D445) over 10 months with different samples stored at 5°C, 40°C, and cyclic thermal conditions. Among the three biodiesel base fuels (B100) studied, Bio1 (from tallow) and Bio2 (from yellow grease) showed the largest increase in AN throughout 6 months of storage at 40°C while Bio3 (from canola) showed the least increase in AN. Bio1, Bio2, and Bio3 samples stored at 5°C showed very little increases in acidity after 10 month, while samples stored under thermal cycling conditions were comparable to those stored at 40°C. The AN for ULSDF and all blends between B2 and B20 for Bio1, Bio2 and Bio3 remained in the range of 0.1–0.3 mg KOH g−1 for all temperatures and throughout the storage period well below the ASTM 6751 limit of 0.5 mg KOH g−1. All blends showed a lower increase in AN than any of the base fuels. All fuels were submitted to accelerated oxidative testing, which also revealed a greater stability of the blends than for the biodiesel base fuels. Bio1 (from tallow) blends displayed a greater stability under accelerated oxidative testing while Bio2 (from yellow grease) displayed the least. The impact of storage conditions on the viscosities of all the base fuels and blends was negligible.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleStorage Stability of Biodiesel and Ultralow Sulfur Diesel Fuel Blends
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4000177
    journal fristpage41801
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    keywordsStability
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsStorage
    keywordsBiodiesel
    keywordsDiesel
    keywordsSulfur AND Viscosity
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian