YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Mine Impact Burial Prediction From One to Three Dimensions

    Source: Applied Mechanics Reviews:;2009:;volume( 062 ):;issue: 001::page 10802
    Author:
    Peter C. Chu
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3013823
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The Navy’s mine impact burial prediction model creates a time history of a cylindrical or a noncylindrical mine as it falls through air, water, and sediment. The output of the model is the predicted mine trajectory in air and water columns, burial depth/orientation in sediment, as well as height, area, and volume protruding. Model inputs consist of parameters of environment, mine characteristics, and initial release. This paper reviews near three decades’ effort on model development from one to three dimensions: (1) one-dimensional models predict the vertical position of the mine’s center of mass (COM) with the assumption of constant falling angle, (2) two-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,z) plane and the rotation around the y-axis, and (3) three-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,y,z) space and the rotation around the x-, y-, and z-axes. These models are verified using the data collected from mine impact burial experiments. The one-dimensional model only solves one momentum equation (in the z-direction). It cannot predict the mine trajectory and burial depth well. The two-dimensional model restricts the mine motion in the (x,z) plane (which requires motionless for the environmental fluids) and uses incorrect drag coefficients and inaccurate sediment dynamics. The prediction errors are large in the mine trajectory and burial depth prediction (six to ten times larger than the observed depth in sand bottom of the Monterey Bay). The three-dimensional model predicts the trajectory and burial depth relatively well for cylindrical, near-cylindrical mines, and operational mines such as Manta and Rockan mines.
    keyword(s): Force , Drag (Fluid dynamics) , Sediments , Water , Cylinders , Shapes , Cavities , Trajectories (Physics) , Fluids , Drops AND Equations ,
    • Download: (1.901Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Mine Impact Burial Prediction From One to Three Dimensions

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/139668
    Collections
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPeter C. Chu
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:31:08Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:31:08Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0003-6900
    identifier otherAMREAD-25907#010802_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/139668
    description abstractThe Navy’s mine impact burial prediction model creates a time history of a cylindrical or a noncylindrical mine as it falls through air, water, and sediment. The output of the model is the predicted mine trajectory in air and water columns, burial depth/orientation in sediment, as well as height, area, and volume protruding. Model inputs consist of parameters of environment, mine characteristics, and initial release. This paper reviews near three decades’ effort on model development from one to three dimensions: (1) one-dimensional models predict the vertical position of the mine’s center of mass (COM) with the assumption of constant falling angle, (2) two-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,z) plane and the rotation around the y-axis, and (3) three-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,y,z) space and the rotation around the x-, y-, and z-axes. These models are verified using the data collected from mine impact burial experiments. The one-dimensional model only solves one momentum equation (in the z-direction). It cannot predict the mine trajectory and burial depth well. The two-dimensional model restricts the mine motion in the (x,z) plane (which requires motionless for the environmental fluids) and uses incorrect drag coefficients and inaccurate sediment dynamics. The prediction errors are large in the mine trajectory and burial depth prediction (six to ten times larger than the observed depth in sand bottom of the Monterey Bay). The three-dimensional model predicts the trajectory and burial depth relatively well for cylindrical, near-cylindrical mines, and operational mines such as Manta and Rockan mines.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMine Impact Burial Prediction From One to Three Dimensions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume62
    journal issue1
    journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3013823
    journal fristpage10802
    identifier eissn0003-6900
    keywordsForce
    keywordsDrag (Fluid dynamics)
    keywordsSediments
    keywordsWater
    keywordsCylinders
    keywordsShapes
    keywordsCavities
    keywordsTrajectories (Physics)
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsDrops AND Equations
    treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2009:;volume( 062 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian