YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Leak Before Break: Studies in Support of New R6 Guidance on Leak Rate Evaluation

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 001::page 11402
    Author:
    J. P. Taggart
    ,
    P. J. Budden
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2826422
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The concept of leak-before-break (LBB) is often used in safety cases for pressure systems, particularly, in the nuclear industry. An important factor in making a LBB case is in the prediction of the leak rate of fluid through a crack. This paper presents a summary of a program of work, which had the aim of improving guidance on leak rate evaluation for the LBB procedures in the R6 defect assessment methodology. Methods of calculating leak rates have been reviewed, and this has led to a crack morphology model being proposed, which represents single-phase isothermal compressible flow through a crack. In the crack morphology model, the flow is assumed by default to be fully rough turbulent, and the effective roughness to vary between a local roughness value for narrow cracks and a global value (i.e., the overall crack contours) for wide cracks. The effect of pressure drops due to changes in the flow direction at crack turns has also been included. Calculations using the model show that the friction factor relation due to (1991, “ Leakage Flow Through Small Cracks—Report of Second Stage of Experimental Work,” unpublished) gives better agreement with measured flow rates than that due to (1978, “ Gas Flow Through Cracks,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 100, pp. 453–458), which tends to overestimate the flow rate for the examples studied. The inclusion of an inertial pressure term arising from changes in overall flow direction appears to be justified.
    • Download: (114.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Leak Before Break: Studies in Support of New R6 Guidance on Leak Rate Evaluation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/139244
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. P. Taggart
    contributor authorP. J. Budden
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:30:21Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:30:21Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28489#011402_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/139244
    description abstractThe concept of leak-before-break (LBB) is often used in safety cases for pressure systems, particularly, in the nuclear industry. An important factor in making a LBB case is in the prediction of the leak rate of fluid through a crack. This paper presents a summary of a program of work, which had the aim of improving guidance on leak rate evaluation for the LBB procedures in the R6 defect assessment methodology. Methods of calculating leak rates have been reviewed, and this has led to a crack morphology model being proposed, which represents single-phase isothermal compressible flow through a crack. In the crack morphology model, the flow is assumed by default to be fully rough turbulent, and the effective roughness to vary between a local roughness value for narrow cracks and a global value (i.e., the overall crack contours) for wide cracks. The effect of pressure drops due to changes in the flow direction at crack turns has also been included. Calculations using the model show that the friction factor relation due to (1991, “ Leakage Flow Through Small Cracks—Report of Second Stage of Experimental Work,” unpublished) gives better agreement with measured flow rates than that due to (1978, “ Gas Flow Through Cracks,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 100, pp. 453–458), which tends to overestimate the flow rate for the examples studied. The inclusion of an inertial pressure term arising from changes in overall flow direction appears to be justified.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLeak Before Break: Studies in Support of New R6 Guidance on Leak Rate Evaluation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2826422
    journal fristpage11402
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian