A High-Pressure Droplet Model for Spray SimulationsSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 003::page 482DOI: 10.1115/1.1915390Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Droplet vaporization models that are currently employed in simulating sprays are based on a quasisteady, low-pressure formulation. These models do not adequately represent many high-pressure effects, such as nonideal gas behavior, solubility of gases into liquid, pressure dependence of gas- and liquid-phase thermophysical properties, and transient liquid transport in the droplet interior. In the present study, a high-pressure quasisteady droplet vaporization model is developed for use in comprehensive spray simulations for which more rigorous vaporization models, such as those based on unsteady formulations, are beyond the present computational capabilities. Except for the gas-phase quasisteady assumption that is retained in the model, the model incorporates all high-pressure effects. The applicability of the model for predicting droplet vaporization in diesel and gas turbine combustion environments is evaluated by comparing its predictions with the available experimental data and with those from a more comprehensive transient model. Results indicate a fairly good agreement between the quasisteady (QS) and transient (TS) models for a wide range of pressures at low ambient temperatures, and for pressure up to the fuel critical pressure at high ambient temperatures. The QS model generally underpredicts the vaporization rate during the earlier part of droplet lifetime and overpredicts during the later part of lifetime compared to those using the TS model, and the difference becomes increasingly more significant at higher ambient pressure and temperature. The differences can be attributed to the quasisteady gas-phase average temperature and composition assumption for the QS model that reduces and increases the gas-phase heat and mass fluxes at the droplet surface during the earlier and later part of lifetime, respectively. The applicability of the QS model is quantified in terms of the maximum pressure as a function of ambient temperature.
keyword(s): Pressure , Temperature , High pressure (Physics) , Sprays , Fuels AND Engineering simulation ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Changlin Yan | |
| contributor author | Suresh K. Aggarwal | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:19:47Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:19:47Z | |
| date copyright | July, 2006 | |
| date issued | 2006 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-26914#482_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133649 | |
| description abstract | Droplet vaporization models that are currently employed in simulating sprays are based on a quasisteady, low-pressure formulation. These models do not adequately represent many high-pressure effects, such as nonideal gas behavior, solubility of gases into liquid, pressure dependence of gas- and liquid-phase thermophysical properties, and transient liquid transport in the droplet interior. In the present study, a high-pressure quasisteady droplet vaporization model is developed for use in comprehensive spray simulations for which more rigorous vaporization models, such as those based on unsteady formulations, are beyond the present computational capabilities. Except for the gas-phase quasisteady assumption that is retained in the model, the model incorporates all high-pressure effects. The applicability of the model for predicting droplet vaporization in diesel and gas turbine combustion environments is evaluated by comparing its predictions with the available experimental data and with those from a more comprehensive transient model. Results indicate a fairly good agreement between the quasisteady (QS) and transient (TS) models for a wide range of pressures at low ambient temperatures, and for pressure up to the fuel critical pressure at high ambient temperatures. The QS model generally underpredicts the vaporization rate during the earlier part of droplet lifetime and overpredicts during the later part of lifetime compared to those using the TS model, and the difference becomes increasingly more significant at higher ambient pressure and temperature. The differences can be attributed to the quasisteady gas-phase average temperature and composition assumption for the QS model that reduces and increases the gas-phase heat and mass fluxes at the droplet surface during the earlier and later part of lifetime, respectively. The applicability of the QS model is quantified in terms of the maximum pressure as a function of ambient temperature. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A High-Pressure Droplet Model for Spray Simulations | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 128 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1915390 | |
| journal fristpage | 482 | |
| journal lastpage | 492 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Temperature | |
| keywords | High pressure (Physics) | |
| keywords | Sprays | |
| keywords | Fuels AND Engineering simulation | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |