A Methodology for Simulating Compressible Turbulent FlowsSource: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2006:;volume( 073 ):;issue: 003::page 405DOI: 10.1115/1.2150231Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: A flow simulation Methodology (FSM) is presented for computing the time-dependent behavior of complex compressible turbulent flows. The development of FSM was initiated in close collaboration with C. Speziale (then at Boston University). The objective of FSM is to provide the proper amount of turbulence modeling for the unresolved scales while directly computing the largest scales. The strategy is implemented by using state-of-the-art turbulence models (as developed for Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)) and scaling of the model terms with a “contribution function.” The contribution function is dependent on the local and instantaneous “physical” resolution in the computation. This physical resolution is determined during the actual simulation by comparing the size of the smallest relevant scales to the local grid size used in the computation. The contribution function is designed such that it provides no modeling if the computation is locally well resolved so that it approaches direct numerical simulations (DNS) in the fine-grid limit and such that it provides modeling of all scales in the coarse-grid limit and thus approaches a RANS calculation. In between these resolution limits, the contribution function adjusts the necessary modeling for the unresolved scales while the larger (resolved) scales are computed as in large eddy simulation (LES). However, FSM is distinctly different from LES in that it allows for a consistent transition between RANS, LES, and DNS within the same simulation depending on the local flow behavior and “physical” resolution. As a consequence, FSM should require considerably fewer grid points for a given calculation than would be necessary for a LES. This conjecture is substantiated by employing FSM to calculate the flow over a backward-facing step and a plane wake behind a bluff body, both at low Mach number, and supersonic axisymmetric wakes. These examples were chosen such that they expose, on the one hand, the inherent difficulties of simulating (physically) complex flows, and, on the other hand, demonstrate the potential of the FSM approach for simulations of turbulent compressible flows for complex geometries.
keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Turbulence , Wakes , Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations AND Equations ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Hermann F. Fasel | |
| contributor author | Dominic A. von Terzi | |
| contributor author | Richard D. Sandberg | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:18:39Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:18:39Z | |
| date copyright | May, 2006 | |
| date issued | 2006 | |
| identifier issn | 0021-8936 | |
| identifier other | JAMCAV-26599#405_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133047 | |
| description abstract | A flow simulation Methodology (FSM) is presented for computing the time-dependent behavior of complex compressible turbulent flows. The development of FSM was initiated in close collaboration with C. Speziale (then at Boston University). The objective of FSM is to provide the proper amount of turbulence modeling for the unresolved scales while directly computing the largest scales. The strategy is implemented by using state-of-the-art turbulence models (as developed for Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)) and scaling of the model terms with a “contribution function.” The contribution function is dependent on the local and instantaneous “physical” resolution in the computation. This physical resolution is determined during the actual simulation by comparing the size of the smallest relevant scales to the local grid size used in the computation. The contribution function is designed such that it provides no modeling if the computation is locally well resolved so that it approaches direct numerical simulations (DNS) in the fine-grid limit and such that it provides modeling of all scales in the coarse-grid limit and thus approaches a RANS calculation. In between these resolution limits, the contribution function adjusts the necessary modeling for the unresolved scales while the larger (resolved) scales are computed as in large eddy simulation (LES). However, FSM is distinctly different from LES in that it allows for a consistent transition between RANS, LES, and DNS within the same simulation depending on the local flow behavior and “physical” resolution. As a consequence, FSM should require considerably fewer grid points for a given calculation than would be necessary for a LES. This conjecture is substantiated by employing FSM to calculate the flow over a backward-facing step and a plane wake behind a bluff body, both at low Mach number, and supersonic axisymmetric wakes. These examples were chosen such that they expose, on the one hand, the inherent difficulties of simulating (physically) complex flows, and, on the other hand, demonstrate the potential of the FSM approach for simulations of turbulent compressible flows for complex geometries. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Methodology for Simulating Compressible Turbulent Flows | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 73 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Applied Mechanics | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2150231 | |
| journal fristpage | 405 | |
| journal lastpage | 412 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-9036 | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Wakes | |
| keywords | Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations AND Equations | |
| tree | Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2006:;volume( 073 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |