Active Flow Control Using Steady Blowing for a Low-Pressure Turbine CascadeSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004::page 560DOI: 10.1115/1.1791291Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The paper presents mid-span measurements for a turbine cascade with active flow control. Steady blowing through an inclined plane wall jet has been used to control the separation characteristics of a high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Measurements were made at design incidence for blowing ratios from approximately 0.25 to 2.0 (ratio of jet-to-local freestream velocity), for Reynolds numbers of 25,000 and 50,000 (based on axial chord and inlet velocity), and for freestream turbulence intensities of 0.4% and 4%. Detailed flow field measurements were made downstream of the cascade using a three-hole pressure probe, static pressure distributions were measured on the airfoil suction surface, and hot-wire measurements were made to characterize the interaction between the wall jet and boundary layer. The primary focus of the study is on the low-Reynolds number and low-freestream turbulence intensity cases, where the baseline airfoil stalls and high profile losses result. For low freestream turbulence (0.4%), the examined method of flow control was effective at preventing stall and reducing the profile losses. At a Reynolds number of 25,000, a blowing ratio greater than 1.0 was required to suppress stall. At a Reynolds number of 50,000, a closed separation bubble formed at a very low blowing ratio (0.25) resulting in a significant reduction in the profile loss. For high freestream turbulence intensity (4%), where the baseline airfoil has a closed separation bubble and low profile losses, blowing ratios below 1.0 resulted in a larger separation bubble and higher losses. The mechanism by which the wall jet affects the separation characteristics of the airfoil is examined through hot-wire traverse measurements in the vicinity of the slot.
keyword(s): Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Separation (Technology) , Measurement , Turbulence , Suction , Reynolds number , Cascades (Fluid dynamics) , Boundary layers , Turbines , Flow control , Airfoils , Bubbles , Blades AND Wire ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Brian R. McAuliffe | |
| contributor author | Steen A. Sjolander | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:14:39Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:14:39Z | |
| date copyright | October, 2004 | |
| date issued | 2004 | |
| identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
| identifier other | JOTUEI-28715#560_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/130957 | |
| description abstract | The paper presents mid-span measurements for a turbine cascade with active flow control. Steady blowing through an inclined plane wall jet has been used to control the separation characteristics of a high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Measurements were made at design incidence for blowing ratios from approximately 0.25 to 2.0 (ratio of jet-to-local freestream velocity), for Reynolds numbers of 25,000 and 50,000 (based on axial chord and inlet velocity), and for freestream turbulence intensities of 0.4% and 4%. Detailed flow field measurements were made downstream of the cascade using a three-hole pressure probe, static pressure distributions were measured on the airfoil suction surface, and hot-wire measurements were made to characterize the interaction between the wall jet and boundary layer. The primary focus of the study is on the low-Reynolds number and low-freestream turbulence intensity cases, where the baseline airfoil stalls and high profile losses result. For low freestream turbulence (0.4%), the examined method of flow control was effective at preventing stall and reducing the profile losses. At a Reynolds number of 25,000, a blowing ratio greater than 1.0 was required to suppress stall. At a Reynolds number of 50,000, a closed separation bubble formed at a very low blowing ratio (0.25) resulting in a significant reduction in the profile loss. For high freestream turbulence intensity (4%), where the baseline airfoil has a closed separation bubble and low profile losses, blowing ratios below 1.0 resulted in a larger separation bubble and higher losses. The mechanism by which the wall jet affects the separation characteristics of the airfoil is examined through hot-wire traverse measurements in the vicinity of the slot. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Active Flow Control Using Steady Blowing for a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 126 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1791291 | |
| journal fristpage | 560 | |
| journal lastpage | 569 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Separation (Technology) | |
| keywords | Measurement | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Suction | |
| keywords | Reynolds number | |
| keywords | Cascades (Fluid dynamics) | |
| keywords | Boundary layers | |
| keywords | Turbines | |
| keywords | Flow control | |
| keywords | Airfoils | |
| keywords | Bubbles | |
| keywords | Blades AND Wire | |
| tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |