YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001::page 365
    Author:
    M. Gambini
    ,
    M. Vellini
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1519270
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this paper thermodynamical and economic analyses of fossil-fuel-fired power plants, equipped with systems for CO2 recovery, are presented. The investigation has been developed with reference to power plants representative both of consolidated technology (i.e., steam cycle and combined cycle power plants), and of emerging or innovative technology (integrated coal gasification combined cycle, IGCC, and advanced mixed cycle, AMC). There are two main methods to reduce CO2 from power plant flue gas: physical and chemical absorption. In this work chemical absorption and liquefaction of CO2 removed have been considered. With reference to thermodynamical and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with CO2 removal systems and units for liquefaction of the removed carbon dioxide. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different power plants here considered: their efficiency decreases in a range of 6 percentage points to nearly 13, while the electricity production cost increases in a range of 25% until 72%. The AMC stands out among the other power plants here analyzed because, after CO2 recovery, it exhibits the lowest net work output decrease, the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, its economic impact is favorable when the AMC is equipped with systems for CO2 recovery. As a result it achieves a net electric efficiency of about 50% with a carbon dioxide emission of about 0.04 kg/kWh, and the electricity production cost rises to about 25% in comparison with an AMC without CO2 removal and liquefaction systems.
    keyword(s): Liquefaction , Power stations , Carbon dioxide , Cycles , Exhaust systems , Industrial plants , Steam , Emissions , Integrated gasification combined cycle , Coal , Separation (Technology) , Pressure AND Fuels ,
    • Download: (545.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/128453
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Gambini
    contributor authorM. Vellini
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:10:19Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:10:19Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26819#365_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/128453
    description abstractIn this paper thermodynamical and economic analyses of fossil-fuel-fired power plants, equipped with systems for CO2 recovery, are presented. The investigation has been developed with reference to power plants representative both of consolidated technology (i.e., steam cycle and combined cycle power plants), and of emerging or innovative technology (integrated coal gasification combined cycle, IGCC, and advanced mixed cycle, AMC). There are two main methods to reduce CO2 from power plant flue gas: physical and chemical absorption. In this work chemical absorption and liquefaction of CO2 removed have been considered. With reference to thermodynamical and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with CO2 removal systems and units for liquefaction of the removed carbon dioxide. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different power plants here considered: their efficiency decreases in a range of 6 percentage points to nearly 13, while the electricity production cost increases in a range of 25% until 72%. The AMC stands out among the other power plants here analyzed because, after CO2 recovery, it exhibits the lowest net work output decrease, the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, its economic impact is favorable when the AMC is equipped with systems for CO2 recovery. As a result it achieves a net electric efficiency of about 50% with a carbon dioxide emission of about 0.04 kg/kWh, and the electricity production cost rises to about 25% in comparison with an AMC without CO2 removal and liquefaction systems.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleCO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume125
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1519270
    journal fristpage365
    journal lastpage373
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsLiquefaction
    keywordsPower stations
    keywordsCarbon dioxide
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsExhaust systems
    keywordsIndustrial plants
    keywordsSteam
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsIntegrated gasification combined cycle
    keywordsCoal
    keywordsSeparation (Technology)
    keywordsPressure AND Fuels
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian