CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas TreatmentSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001::page 365DOI: 10.1115/1.1519270Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In this paper thermodynamical and economic analyses of fossil-fuel-fired power plants, equipped with systems for CO2 recovery, are presented. The investigation has been developed with reference to power plants representative both of consolidated technology (i.e., steam cycle and combined cycle power plants), and of emerging or innovative technology (integrated coal gasification combined cycle, IGCC, and advanced mixed cycle, AMC). There are two main methods to reduce CO2 from power plant flue gas: physical and chemical absorption. In this work chemical absorption and liquefaction of CO2 removed have been considered. With reference to thermodynamical and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with CO2 removal systems and units for liquefaction of the removed carbon dioxide. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different power plants here considered: their efficiency decreases in a range of 6 percentage points to nearly 13, while the electricity production cost increases in a range of 25% until 72%. The AMC stands out among the other power plants here analyzed because, after CO2 recovery, it exhibits the lowest net work output decrease, the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, its economic impact is favorable when the AMC is equipped with systems for CO2 recovery. As a result it achieves a net electric efficiency of about 50% with a carbon dioxide emission of about 0.04 kg/kWh, and the electricity production cost rises to about 25% in comparison with an AMC without CO2 removal and liquefaction systems.
keyword(s): Liquefaction , Power stations , Carbon dioxide , Cycles , Exhaust systems , Industrial plants , Steam , Emissions , Integrated gasification combined cycle , Coal , Separation (Technology) , Pressure AND Fuels ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | M. Gambini | |
| contributor author | M. Vellini | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:10:19Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:10:19Z | |
| date copyright | January, 2003 | |
| date issued | 2003 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-26819#365_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/128453 | |
| description abstract | In this paper thermodynamical and economic analyses of fossil-fuel-fired power plants, equipped with systems for CO2 recovery, are presented. The investigation has been developed with reference to power plants representative both of consolidated technology (i.e., steam cycle and combined cycle power plants), and of emerging or innovative technology (integrated coal gasification combined cycle, IGCC, and advanced mixed cycle, AMC). There are two main methods to reduce CO2 from power plant flue gas: physical and chemical absorption. In this work chemical absorption and liquefaction of CO2 removed have been considered. With reference to thermodynamical and economic performance, significant comparisons have been made between the above introduced reference plants. An efficiency decrease and an increase in the cost of electricity has been obtained when power plants are equipped with CO2 removal systems and units for liquefaction of the removed carbon dioxide. The main results of the performed investigation are quite variable among the different power plants here considered: their efficiency decreases in a range of 6 percentage points to nearly 13, while the electricity production cost increases in a range of 25% until 72%. The AMC stands out among the other power plants here analyzed because, after CO2 recovery, it exhibits the lowest net work output decrease, the highest net efficiency and the lowest final specific CO2 emission. In addition to this, its economic impact is favorable when the AMC is equipped with systems for CO2 recovery. As a result it achieves a net electric efficiency of about 50% with a carbon dioxide emission of about 0.04 kg/kWh, and the electricity production cost rises to about 25% in comparison with an AMC without CO2 removal and liquefaction systems. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 125 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1519270 | |
| journal fristpage | 365 | |
| journal lastpage | 373 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Liquefaction | |
| keywords | Power stations | |
| keywords | Carbon dioxide | |
| keywords | Cycles | |
| keywords | Exhaust systems | |
| keywords | Industrial plants | |
| keywords | Steam | |
| keywords | Emissions | |
| keywords | Integrated gasification combined cycle | |
| keywords | Coal | |
| keywords | Separation (Technology) | |
| keywords | Pressure AND Fuels | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2003:;volume( 125 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |