Performance Evaluation of Pumps in Air and WaterSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1968:;volume( 090 ):;issue: 002::page 145Author:Glenn M. Wood
DOI: 10.1115/1.3609153Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: To explore the feasibility of establishing pump performance in air, two different designs were tested over the same range of shaft speed and flow rate in both water and air. The larger unit of 3000-gpm capacity was of unshrouded design, whereas the smaller, 195-gpm capacity pump was fabricated with a full tip shroud on the impeller. Although similar trends in performance were observed for each pump tested in air and water, some dissimilarities were observed. In particular, the head rise characteristic curves for both pumps were noticeably higher in air than in water. This is contrary to trends predicted by Reynolds number effects and is apparently due to significant difference in the impeller tip leakage flows when pumping liquid or gas.
keyword(s): Pumps , Performance evaluation , Water , Impellers , Design , Flow (Dynamics) , Reynolds number AND Leakage flows ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Glenn M. Wood | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:06:27Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:06:27Z | |
| date copyright | April, 1968 | |
| date issued | 1968 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-26668#145_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/126168 | |
| description abstract | To explore the feasibility of establishing pump performance in air, two different designs were tested over the same range of shaft speed and flow rate in both water and air. The larger unit of 3000-gpm capacity was of unshrouded design, whereas the smaller, 195-gpm capacity pump was fabricated with a full tip shroud on the impeller. Although similar trends in performance were observed for each pump tested in air and water, some dissimilarities were observed. In particular, the head rise characteristic curves for both pumps were noticeably higher in air than in water. This is contrary to trends predicted by Reynolds number effects and is apparently due to significant difference in the impeller tip leakage flows when pumping liquid or gas. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Performance Evaluation of Pumps in Air and Water | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 90 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3609153 | |
| journal fristpage | 145 | |
| journal lastpage | 148 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Pumps | |
| keywords | Performance evaluation | |
| keywords | Water | |
| keywords | Impellers | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Reynolds number AND Leakage flows | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1968:;volume( 090 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |