YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Kinematic Accuracy of Three Surface Registration Methods in a Three-Dimensional Wrist Bone Study

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 005::page 528
    Author:
    C. P. Neu
    ,
    R. D. McGovern
    ,
    J. J. Crisco
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1289992
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The use of registration techniques to determine motion transformations noninvasively has become more widespread with the increased availability of the necessary software. In this study, three surface registration techniques were used to generate carpal bone kinematic results from a single cadaveric wrist specimen. Surface contours were extracted from specimen computed tomography volume images of the forearm, carpal, and metacarpal bones in four arbitrary positions. Kinematic results from each of three registration techniques were compared with results derived from multiple spherical markers fixed to the specimen. Kinematic accuracy was found to depend on the registration method and bone size and shape. In general, rotation errors of the capitate and scaphoid were less than 0.5 deg for all three techniques. Rotation errors for the other bones were generally less than 2 deg, although error for the trapezoid was greater than 2 deg in one technique. Translation errors of the bones were generally less than 1 mm, although errors of the trapezoid and trapezium were greater than 1 mm for two techniques. Tradeoffs existed in each registration method between image processing time and overall kinematic accuracy. Markerless bone registration (MBR) can provide accurate measurements of carpal kinematics and can be used to study the noninvasive, three-dimensional in vivo kinematics of the wrist and other skeletal joints. [S0148-0731(00)01105-5]
    keyword(s): Rotation , Bone , Errors AND Motion ,
    • Download: (580.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Kinematic Accuracy of Three Surface Registration Methods in a Three-Dimensional Wrist Bone Study

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/123338
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorC. P. Neu
    contributor authorR. D. McGovern
    contributor authorJ. J. Crisco
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:01:50Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:01:50Z
    date copyrightOctober, 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26095#528_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123338
    description abstractThe use of registration techniques to determine motion transformations noninvasively has become more widespread with the increased availability of the necessary software. In this study, three surface registration techniques were used to generate carpal bone kinematic results from a single cadaveric wrist specimen. Surface contours were extracted from specimen computed tomography volume images of the forearm, carpal, and metacarpal bones in four arbitrary positions. Kinematic results from each of three registration techniques were compared with results derived from multiple spherical markers fixed to the specimen. Kinematic accuracy was found to depend on the registration method and bone size and shape. In general, rotation errors of the capitate and scaphoid were less than 0.5 deg for all three techniques. Rotation errors for the other bones were generally less than 2 deg, although error for the trapezoid was greater than 2 deg in one technique. Translation errors of the bones were generally less than 1 mm, although errors of the trapezoid and trapezium were greater than 1 mm for two techniques. Tradeoffs existed in each registration method between image processing time and overall kinematic accuracy. Markerless bone registration (MBR) can provide accurate measurements of carpal kinematics and can be used to study the noninvasive, three-dimensional in vivo kinematics of the wrist and other skeletal joints. [S0148-0731(00)01105-5]
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleKinematic Accuracy of Three Surface Registration Methods in a Three-Dimensional Wrist Bone Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1289992
    journal fristpage528
    journal lastpage533
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsRotation
    keywordsBone
    keywordsErrors AND Motion
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian