Monotonic Convergence Property of Turbulent Flow Solution With Central Difference and QUICK SchemesSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 002::page 351Author:Toshiyuki Hayase
DOI: 10.1115/1.2822213Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Monotonic convergence of numerical solutions with the computational grid refinement is an essential requirement in estimating the grid-dependent uncertainty of computational fluid dynamics. If the convergence is not monotonic, the solution could be erroneously regarded as convergent at the local extremum with respect to some measure of the error. On the other hand, if the convergence is exactly monotonic, estimation methods such as Richardson extrapolation properly evaluate the uncertainty of numerical solutions. This paper deals with the characterization of numerical schemes based on the property of the monotonic convergence of numerical solutions. Two typical discretization schemes of convective terms were considered; the second-order central difference scheme and the third-order Leonard’s QUICK scheme. A fully developed turbulent flow through a square duct was calculated via a SIMPLER based finite volume method without a turbulence model. The convergence of the numerical solution with the grid refinement was investigated for the mean flow property as well as fluctuations. The comparison of convergence process between the discretization schemes has revealed that the QUICK scheme results in preferable monotonic convergence, while the second-order central difference scheme undergoes non-monotonic convergence. The latter possibly misleads the determination of convergence with the grid refinement, or causes trouble in applying the Richardson extrapolation procedure to estimate the numerical uncertainty.
keyword(s): Turbulence , Uncertainty , Flow (Dynamics) , Fluctuations (Physics) , Computational fluid dynamics , Fully developed turbulent flow , Ducts , Errors AND Finite volume methods ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Toshiyuki Hayase | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:00:04Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:00:04Z | |
| date copyright | June, 1999 | |
| date issued | 1999 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-27140#351_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/122362 | |
| description abstract | Monotonic convergence of numerical solutions with the computational grid refinement is an essential requirement in estimating the grid-dependent uncertainty of computational fluid dynamics. If the convergence is not monotonic, the solution could be erroneously regarded as convergent at the local extremum with respect to some measure of the error. On the other hand, if the convergence is exactly monotonic, estimation methods such as Richardson extrapolation properly evaluate the uncertainty of numerical solutions. This paper deals with the characterization of numerical schemes based on the property of the monotonic convergence of numerical solutions. Two typical discretization schemes of convective terms were considered; the second-order central difference scheme and the third-order Leonard’s QUICK scheme. A fully developed turbulent flow through a square duct was calculated via a SIMPLER based finite volume method without a turbulence model. The convergence of the numerical solution with the grid refinement was investigated for the mean flow property as well as fluctuations. The comparison of convergence process between the discretization schemes has revealed that the QUICK scheme results in preferable monotonic convergence, while the second-order central difference scheme undergoes non-monotonic convergence. The latter possibly misleads the determination of convergence with the grid refinement, or causes trouble in applying the Richardson extrapolation procedure to estimate the numerical uncertainty. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Monotonic Convergence Property of Turbulent Flow Solution With Central Difference and QUICK Schemes | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 121 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2822213 | |
| journal fristpage | 351 | |
| journal lastpage | 358 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Uncertainty | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Fluctuations (Physics) | |
| keywords | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| keywords | Fully developed turbulent flow | |
| keywords | Ducts | |
| keywords | Errors AND Finite volume methods | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |