YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Residual Stress Measurement by Successive Extension of a Slot: The Crack Compliance Method

    Source: Applied Mechanics Reviews:;1999:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 002::page 75
    Author:
    Michael B. Prime
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3098926
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This article reviews the technical literature on the determination of a residual stress profile by successive extension of a slot and measurement of the resulting strains or displacements. This technique is known variously in the literature as the crack compliance method, the successive cracking method, the slotting method, and a fracture mechanics based approach. The article briefly summarizes the chronological development of this method and then, to facilitate more detailed review, defines the components that make up the method. The theory section of the article first considers forward method solutions including fracture mechanics, finite element, analytical, and body force methods. Then it examines inverse solutions, including incremental inverses and series expansions. Next, the article reviews all experimental applications of the crack compliance method. Aspects reviewed include the specimen geometry and material, the details of making the slot, the deformation measurement, and the theoretical solutions used to solve for stress. Finally, the article makes a brief qualitative comparison between crack compliance and other residual stress measurement methods. In many situations, the crack compliance method offers several advantages over other methods: improved resolution of residual stress variation with depth; the ability to measure both small and very large parts; measurement of stress intensity factor caused by residual stress; measurement of crack closure stresses; increased sensitivity over other material removal methods; and the ability to measure non-crystalline materials. This review article contains 77 references.
    keyword(s): Stress , Fracture (Materials) , Fracture mechanics , Finite element analysis , Fracture (Process) , Geometry , Resolution (Optics) , Force AND Deformation ,
    • Download: (2.625Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Residual Stress Measurement by Successive Extension of a Slot: The Crack Compliance Method

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/121552
    Collections
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMichael B. Prime
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:58:35Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:58:35Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0003-6900
    identifier otherAMREAD-25760#75_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/121552
    description abstractThis article reviews the technical literature on the determination of a residual stress profile by successive extension of a slot and measurement of the resulting strains or displacements. This technique is known variously in the literature as the crack compliance method, the successive cracking method, the slotting method, and a fracture mechanics based approach. The article briefly summarizes the chronological development of this method and then, to facilitate more detailed review, defines the components that make up the method. The theory section of the article first considers forward method solutions including fracture mechanics, finite element, analytical, and body force methods. Then it examines inverse solutions, including incremental inverses and series expansions. Next, the article reviews all experimental applications of the crack compliance method. Aspects reviewed include the specimen geometry and material, the details of making the slot, the deformation measurement, and the theoretical solutions used to solve for stress. Finally, the article makes a brief qualitative comparison between crack compliance and other residual stress measurement methods. In many situations, the crack compliance method offers several advantages over other methods: improved resolution of residual stress variation with depth; the ability to measure both small and very large parts; measurement of stress intensity factor caused by residual stress; measurement of crack closure stresses; increased sensitivity over other material removal methods; and the ability to measure non-crystalline materials. This review article contains 77 references.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleResidual Stress Measurement by Successive Extension of a Slot: The Crack Compliance Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume52
    journal issue2
    journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3098926
    journal fristpage75
    journal lastpage96
    identifier eissn0003-6900
    keywordsStress
    keywordsFracture (Materials)
    keywordsFracture mechanics
    keywordsFinite element analysis
    keywordsFracture (Process)
    keywordsGeometry
    keywordsResolution (Optics)
    keywordsForce AND Deformation
    treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;1999:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian