Experimental Data on Seismic Response of Piping ComponentsSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 004::page 449Author:G. C. Slagis
DOI: 10.1115/1.2842358Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Experimental data from the EPRI Piping and Fitting Dynamic Reliability Program are evaluated. High-amplitude, seismic time history loads were applied to 32 piping components in a cantilevered configuration. Components included elbows, tees, reducers, a reinforced fabricated tee, a nozzle, and lugs. The test levels were about 2 to 8 times Level D. The seismic capability of elbows is shown to be remarkable. The seismic performance of lugs is judged to be poor. The tests demonstrate that collapse is a potential failure mode, particularly in low-frequency systems. The tests also demonstrate that a fatigue failure in a single, high-level, seismic event is possible. Of the 15 nonelbow tests that failed by fatigue, six (40 percent) failed during the first high-level seismic test. Design and fabrication details are crucial to seismic performance. Trends in the data need to be assessed to determine appropriate Section III stress limits for seismic loads. In particular, the impact of component frequency on seismic capability has to be quantified.
keyword(s): Pipes , Stress , Design , Nozzles , Fatigue , Manufacturing , Reliability , Collapse , Earthquakes , Failure , Fittings AND Fatigue failure ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | G. C. Slagis | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:57:37Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:57:37Z | |
| date copyright | November, 1998 | |
| date issued | 1998 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-28387#449_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/121005 | |
| description abstract | Experimental data from the EPRI Piping and Fitting Dynamic Reliability Program are evaluated. High-amplitude, seismic time history loads were applied to 32 piping components in a cantilevered configuration. Components included elbows, tees, reducers, a reinforced fabricated tee, a nozzle, and lugs. The test levels were about 2 to 8 times Level D. The seismic capability of elbows is shown to be remarkable. The seismic performance of lugs is judged to be poor. The tests demonstrate that collapse is a potential failure mode, particularly in low-frequency systems. The tests also demonstrate that a fatigue failure in a single, high-level, seismic event is possible. Of the 15 nonelbow tests that failed by fatigue, six (40 percent) failed during the first high-level seismic test. Design and fabrication details are crucial to seismic performance. Trends in the data need to be assessed to determine appropriate Section III stress limits for seismic loads. In particular, the impact of component frequency on seismic capability has to be quantified. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Experimental Data on Seismic Response of Piping Components | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 120 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2842358 | |
| journal fristpage | 449 | |
| journal lastpage | 455 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Pipes | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Nozzles | |
| keywords | Fatigue | |
| keywords | Manufacturing | |
| keywords | Reliability | |
| keywords | Collapse | |
| keywords | Earthquakes | |
| keywords | Failure | |
| keywords | Fittings AND Fatigue failure | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |