YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Industrial Gas Turbine Performance Uprates: Tips, Tricks, and Traps

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 004::page 727
    Author:
    T. L. Ragland
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2818460
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: After industrial gas turbines have been in production for some amount of time, there is often an opportunity to improve or uprate the engine’s output power, cycle efficiency, or both. Typically, the manufacturer would like to provide these uprates without compromising the proven reliability and durability of the product. Further, the manufacturer would like the development of this uprate to be low cost, low risk, and result in an improvement in customer value over that of the original design. This Paper describes several options available for enhancing the performance of an existing industrial gas turbine engine, and discusses the implications for each option. Advantages and disadvantages of each option are given along with considerations that should be taken into account in selecting one option over another. Specific options discussed include dimensional scaling, improving component efficiencies, increasing massflow compressor zero staging, increasing firing temperature (thermal uprate), adding a recuperator, increasing cycle pressure ratio, and converting to a single shaft design. The implications on output power, cycle efficiency, off-design performance engine life or time between overhaul (TBO), engine cost, development time and cost, auxiliary requirements, and product support issues are discussed. Several examples are provided where these options have been successfully implemented in industrial gas turbine engines.
    keyword(s): Industrial gases , Turbines , Cycles , Design , Engines , Gas turbines , Compressors , Reliability , Pressure , Temperature , Durability AND Firing (materials) ,
    • Download: (1.072Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Industrial Gas Turbine Performance Uprates: Tips, Tricks, and Traps

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/120360
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorT. L. Ragland
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:56:28Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:56:28Z
    date copyrightOctober, 1998
    date issued1998
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26785#727_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120360
    description abstractAfter industrial gas turbines have been in production for some amount of time, there is often an opportunity to improve or uprate the engine’s output power, cycle efficiency, or both. Typically, the manufacturer would like to provide these uprates without compromising the proven reliability and durability of the product. Further, the manufacturer would like the development of this uprate to be low cost, low risk, and result in an improvement in customer value over that of the original design. This Paper describes several options available for enhancing the performance of an existing industrial gas turbine engine, and discusses the implications for each option. Advantages and disadvantages of each option are given along with considerations that should be taken into account in selecting one option over another. Specific options discussed include dimensional scaling, improving component efficiencies, increasing massflow compressor zero staging, increasing firing temperature (thermal uprate), adding a recuperator, increasing cycle pressure ratio, and converting to a single shaft design. The implications on output power, cycle efficiency, off-design performance engine life or time between overhaul (TBO), engine cost, development time and cost, auxiliary requirements, and product support issues are discussed. Several examples are provided where these options have been successfully implemented in industrial gas turbine engines.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleIndustrial Gas Turbine Performance Uprates: Tips, Tricks, and Traps
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2818460
    journal fristpage727
    journal lastpage734
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsIndustrial gases
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsCompressors
    keywordsReliability
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsDurability AND Firing (materials)
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian