YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effectiveness of Anti-Liquefaction Techniques for Buried Pipelines

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 003::page 261
    Author:
    T. Akiyoshi
    ,
    K. Fuchida
    ,
    S. Shirinashihama
    ,
    T. Tsutsumi
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2929585
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this paper, effectiveness of several existing anti-liquefaction methods for preventing large deformations of pipelines for lateral flow of liquefied grounds during earthquakes are investigated and compared, as well as a proposed method which fixes pipelines with expansion joints parallel to auxiliary continuous pipes using iron tie-plates. Stiffness of liquefied soils around pipes is represented as a static coefficient of subgrade reaction, based on the experiments on the interaction between liquefied sand deposits and pipes. Pipeline-spring systems which are characterized by those coefficients are analyzed based on the theory of “a beam on an elastic foundation” and transfer matrix method. Computations are performed with respect to the key parameters of pipes, coefficient of subgrade reaction, and several fixing conditions between pipes and underground structures. The sliding displacements of pipelines, rotational angles of joints, and stresses of pipelines are compared for such anti-liquefaction methods as soil-improving methods (sand-compaction pile or ballast-replaced soil methods) and structural-stiffening methods (parallel pipe or pile-supporting methods).
    keyword(s): Liquefaction , Pipelines , Pipes , Soil , Sands , Stress , Compacting , Expansion joints , Plates (structures) , Computation , Earthquakes , Iron , Springs , Stiffness , Flow (Dynamics) AND Deformation ,
    • Download: (517.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Effectiveness of Anti-Liquefaction Techniques for Buried Pipelines

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/114237
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorT. Akiyoshi
    contributor authorK. Fuchida
    contributor authorS. Shirinashihama
    contributor authorT. Tsutsumi
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:45:19Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:45:19Z
    date copyrightAugust, 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28354#261_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/114237
    description abstractIn this paper, effectiveness of several existing anti-liquefaction methods for preventing large deformations of pipelines for lateral flow of liquefied grounds during earthquakes are investigated and compared, as well as a proposed method which fixes pipelines with expansion joints parallel to auxiliary continuous pipes using iron tie-plates. Stiffness of liquefied soils around pipes is represented as a static coefficient of subgrade reaction, based on the experiments on the interaction between liquefied sand deposits and pipes. Pipeline-spring systems which are characterized by those coefficients are analyzed based on the theory of “a beam on an elastic foundation” and transfer matrix method. Computations are performed with respect to the key parameters of pipes, coefficient of subgrade reaction, and several fixing conditions between pipes and underground structures. The sliding displacements of pipelines, rotational angles of joints, and stresses of pipelines are compared for such anti-liquefaction methods as soil-improving methods (sand-compaction pile or ballast-replaced soil methods) and structural-stiffening methods (parallel pipe or pile-supporting methods).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffectiveness of Anti-Liquefaction Techniques for Buried Pipelines
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume116
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2929585
    journal fristpage261
    journal lastpage266
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    keywordsLiquefaction
    keywordsPipelines
    keywordsPipes
    keywordsSoil
    keywordsSands
    keywordsStress
    keywordsCompacting
    keywordsExpansion joints
    keywordsPlates (structures)
    keywordsComputation
    keywordsEarthquakes
    keywordsIron
    keywordsSprings
    keywordsStiffness
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics) AND Deformation
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian