YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Heat Transfer of Buried Pipe for Heat Pump Application

    Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;1991:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 001::page 51
    Author:
    Viung C. Mei
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2929951
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: It is generally felt that the application of line source theory for ground coil design usually resulted in excessive overdesign. It was anticipated that in order for the ground coil heat pump systems to be economically competitive with other residential heating and cooling systems, ground coil overdesign had to be kept to a minimum. A new ground coil model was derived, which based on energy balance rather than the traditional line source theory. It was aimed to more accurately predict the operation of ground coils. It is the intention of this study to compare this ground coil model with models based on line source theory, a simple line source model and a modified line source model, by using them to simulate the same field test data for both summer and winter ground coil operations. The results indicated that for winter coil operation, the new model predicted the coil liquid exit temperature less than 2°C maximum deviation from the measured values, with an average deviation less than 1°C. The modified line source model had an average deviation of more than 1.5°C. For summer operation, all models underpredicted the measured soil temperatures because the effect of thermal backfill material was not included in the models. The new model still predicted the test results better than the other two models. However, when the effect of sand thermal backfill was included in the new model, which was not easy for the other two models, the calculated soil temperatures were almost identical to the test results.
    keyword(s): Heat transfer , Pipes AND Heat pumps ,
    • Download: (465.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Heat Transfer of Buried Pipe for Heat Pump Application

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/109149
    Collections
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorViung C. Mei
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:36:32Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:36:32Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 1991
    date issued1991
    identifier issn0199-6231
    identifier otherJSEEDO-28227#51_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/109149
    description abstractIt is generally felt that the application of line source theory for ground coil design usually resulted in excessive overdesign. It was anticipated that in order for the ground coil heat pump systems to be economically competitive with other residential heating and cooling systems, ground coil overdesign had to be kept to a minimum. A new ground coil model was derived, which based on energy balance rather than the traditional line source theory. It was aimed to more accurately predict the operation of ground coils. It is the intention of this study to compare this ground coil model with models based on line source theory, a simple line source model and a modified line source model, by using them to simulate the same field test data for both summer and winter ground coil operations. The results indicated that for winter coil operation, the new model predicted the coil liquid exit temperature less than 2°C maximum deviation from the measured values, with an average deviation less than 1°C. The modified line source model had an average deviation of more than 1.5°C. For summer operation, all models underpredicted the measured soil temperatures because the effect of thermal backfill material was not included in the models. The new model still predicted the test results better than the other two models. However, when the effect of sand thermal backfill was included in the new model, which was not easy for the other two models, the calculated soil temperatures were almost identical to the test results.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleHeat Transfer of Buried Pipe for Heat Pump Application
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume113
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2929951
    journal fristpage51
    journal lastpage55
    identifier eissn1528-8986
    keywordsHeat transfer
    keywordsPipes AND Heat pumps
    treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;1991:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian