YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Toughness of Warm Worked Martensitic Steels

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1965:;volume( 087 ):;issue: 002::page 307
    Author:
    E. J. Ripling
    ,
    R. S. Lindberg
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3650545
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The Charpy “V” notch transition temperature of quenched and tempered armor steel was lowered by warm stretching at a temperature just below the initial tempering temperature. The transition temperature was lowered almost linearly with prestrain; and a 30 percent deformation suppressed it approximately 150 deg F. This toughness improvement occurred with no change in hardness, although there was a loss in super-transition temperature shelf height. The initial tensile strength of the steel was only slightly changed, while the yield strength was increased and ductility reduced. The enhanced toughness persisted through retempering after warm working. The added heating did not change the hardness while the supertransition shelf was brought back to its “as-received” level. In addition, the tensile strength, yield strength, elongation, and reduction in area of the warm stretched plus tempered and “as-received” steel were essentially identical, resulting in a net increase in toughness. A severe room temperature toughness loss was produced by compressive prestrains in excess of about 10 percent. Retempering after straining not only delayed this precipitous loss until the strain exceeded 25 percent, but also raised the Charpy energy after small compressions to about 140 percent of its “as-received” values. Step-wise prestraining was found to be as effective as a single straining step in lowering transition temperatures. In a single test series warm working by rolling was compared with stretching. The suppression of the transition temperature was found to be almost identical for the two deformation processes.
    keyword(s): Toughness , Martensitic steel , Temperature , Phase transition temperature , Steel , Yield strength , Tensile strength , Deformation , Heating , Armor , Ductility AND Elongation ,
    • Download: (2.534Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Toughness of Warm Worked Martensitic Steels

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/107623
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorE. J. Ripling
    contributor authorR. S. Lindberg
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:33:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:33:52Z
    date copyrightJune, 1965
    date issued1965
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27259#307_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/107623
    description abstractThe Charpy “V” notch transition temperature of quenched and tempered armor steel was lowered by warm stretching at a temperature just below the initial tempering temperature. The transition temperature was lowered almost linearly with prestrain; and a 30 percent deformation suppressed it approximately 150 deg F. This toughness improvement occurred with no change in hardness, although there was a loss in super-transition temperature shelf height. The initial tensile strength of the steel was only slightly changed, while the yield strength was increased and ductility reduced. The enhanced toughness persisted through retempering after warm working. The added heating did not change the hardness while the supertransition shelf was brought back to its “as-received” level. In addition, the tensile strength, yield strength, elongation, and reduction in area of the warm stretched plus tempered and “as-received” steel were essentially identical, resulting in a net increase in toughness. A severe room temperature toughness loss was produced by compressive prestrains in excess of about 10 percent. Retempering after straining not only delayed this precipitous loss until the strain exceeded 25 percent, but also raised the Charpy energy after small compressions to about 140 percent of its “as-received” values. Step-wise prestraining was found to be as effective as a single straining step in lowering transition temperatures. In a single test series warm working by rolling was compared with stretching. The suppression of the transition temperature was found to be almost identical for the two deformation processes.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleToughness of Warm Worked Martensitic Steels
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume87
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3650545
    journal fristpage307
    journal lastpage312
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsToughness
    keywordsMartensitic steel
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsPhase transition temperature
    keywordsSteel
    keywordsYield strength
    keywordsTensile strength
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsHeating
    keywordsArmor
    keywordsDuctility AND Elongation
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1965:;volume( 087 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian