YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Field Evaluation of Gas Turbine Protective Coatings

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1988:;volume( 110 ):;issue: 001::page 142
    Author:
    A. McMinn
    ,
    R. Viswanathan
    ,
    C. L. Knauf
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3240077
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The hot corrosion resistance of several protective coatings that had been applied to MAR-M-509 nozzle guide vanes and exposed in a utility gas turbine has been evaluated. The coatings included basic aluminide, rhodium-aluminide, platinum-rhodium-aluminide, and palladium-aluminide diffusion coatings, and cobalt-chromium-aluminum-yttrium (CoCrAlY) and ceramic overlay coatings. A combination of metallographic examination of vane cross sections and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDS) was employed in the evaluation. The results showed that none of the coatings was totally resistant to corrosive attack. The CoCrAlY and platinum-rhodium-aluminide coatings exhibited the greatest resistance to hot corrosion. The CoCrAlY coated vanes were, however, susceptible to thermal fatigue cracking. Except for the poor performance of the palladium-aluminide coating, the precious metal aluminides offered the best protection against corrosion. Hot isostatically pressing coatings was not found to be beneficial, and in one case appeared detrimental.
    keyword(s): Gas turbines , Protective coatings , Palladium , Platinum , Corrosion , Yttrium , Nozzles , Corrosion resistance , Fatigue cracks , Metals , Aluminum , Cobalt , Coating processes , Ceramics , X-ray analysis , Electrical resistance , Diffusion coatings , Overlays (Materials engineering) , Pressing (Garments) AND Cross section (Physics) ,
    • Download: (2.487Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Field Evaluation of Gas Turbine Protective Coatings

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/103930
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. McMinn
    contributor authorR. Viswanathan
    contributor authorC. L. Knauf
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:27:12Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:27:12Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 1988
    date issued1988
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26651#142_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/103930
    description abstractThe hot corrosion resistance of several protective coatings that had been applied to MAR-M-509 nozzle guide vanes and exposed in a utility gas turbine has been evaluated. The coatings included basic aluminide, rhodium-aluminide, platinum-rhodium-aluminide, and palladium-aluminide diffusion coatings, and cobalt-chromium-aluminum-yttrium (CoCrAlY) and ceramic overlay coatings. A combination of metallographic examination of vane cross sections and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDS) was employed in the evaluation. The results showed that none of the coatings was totally resistant to corrosive attack. The CoCrAlY and platinum-rhodium-aluminide coatings exhibited the greatest resistance to hot corrosion. The CoCrAlY coated vanes were, however, susceptible to thermal fatigue cracking. Except for the poor performance of the palladium-aluminide coating, the precious metal aluminides offered the best protection against corrosion. Hot isostatically pressing coatings was not found to be beneficial, and in one case appeared detrimental.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleField Evaluation of Gas Turbine Protective Coatings
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume110
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3240077
    journal fristpage142
    journal lastpage149
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsProtective coatings
    keywordsPalladium
    keywordsPlatinum
    keywordsCorrosion
    keywordsYttrium
    keywordsNozzles
    keywordsCorrosion resistance
    keywordsFatigue cracks
    keywordsMetals
    keywordsAluminum
    keywordsCobalt
    keywordsCoating processes
    keywordsCeramics
    keywordsX-ray analysis
    keywordsElectrical resistance
    keywordsDiffusion coatings
    keywordsOverlays (Materials engineering)
    keywordsPressing (Garments) AND Cross section (Physics)
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1988:;volume( 110 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian