YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multidiscipline Design Optimization

    Source: Applied Mechanics Reviews:;1988:;volume( 041 ):;issue: 006::page 257
    Author:
    Garret N. Vanderplaats
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3151897
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: While formal optimization techniques are seeing increasing use within individual disciplines, application of this technology to the more general multidiscipline design problem is less common. This is due to both the inherent complexity of multidiscipline design and the fact that design is traditionally separated along discipline lines. The application of optimization to multilevel and multidiscipline design is discussed here. It is seen that, computationally, multilevel design within a single discipline and multidiscipline design across disciplines have similar features, and so are generally treated the same. Multidiscipline optimization at the conceptual level is first discussed and it is seen that this has been done successfully for some time. Then the more general case is discussed where formal mathematical decomposition of the larger problem is required to make optimization practical. Here, the state of the art is still relatively undeveloped. Two basic approaches are briefly described to indicate the concepts, and a simple example is offered. The key idea in persuing the multidiscipline design problem is that the optimum system is seldom the sum of optimum components. It is necessary to properly account for the coupling that exists among the subsystems, while still allowing the individual designer to work with relative freedom within his discipline. It is concluded that to achieve this, considerable research remains ahead.
    keyword(s): Design , Optimization AND Disciplines ,
    • Download: (772.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Multidiscipline Design Optimization

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/103391
    Collections
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGarret N. Vanderplaats
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:26:19Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:26:19Z
    date copyrightJune, 1988
    date issued1988
    identifier issn0003-6900
    identifier otherAMREAD-25562#257_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/103391
    description abstractWhile formal optimization techniques are seeing increasing use within individual disciplines, application of this technology to the more general multidiscipline design problem is less common. This is due to both the inherent complexity of multidiscipline design and the fact that design is traditionally separated along discipline lines. The application of optimization to multilevel and multidiscipline design is discussed here. It is seen that, computationally, multilevel design within a single discipline and multidiscipline design across disciplines have similar features, and so are generally treated the same. Multidiscipline optimization at the conceptual level is first discussed and it is seen that this has been done successfully for some time. Then the more general case is discussed where formal mathematical decomposition of the larger problem is required to make optimization practical. Here, the state of the art is still relatively undeveloped. Two basic approaches are briefly described to indicate the concepts, and a simple example is offered. The key idea in persuing the multidiscipline design problem is that the optimum system is seldom the sum of optimum components. It is necessary to properly account for the coupling that exists among the subsystems, while still allowing the individual designer to work with relative freedom within his discipline. It is concluded that to achieve this, considerable research remains ahead.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMultidiscipline Design Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume41
    journal issue6
    journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3151897
    journal fristpage257
    journal lastpage262
    identifier eissn0003-6900
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsOptimization AND Disciplines
    treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;1988:;volume( 041 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian