| dc.contributor.author | Daniel J. Howes | |
| dc.contributor.author | Charles M. Burt | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:24:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T22:24:09Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | January 2016 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 44093274.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79754 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Traditional meter gates for farm delivery flow measurement from an open channel conveyance have traditionally incorporated round canal gates (Armco type) for control. In recent years, some irrigation water agencies (i.e., irrigation districts) have replaced deteriorating round gates with lower-cost rectangular gates that cover round holes. Similar to the situation described in a companion paper, where round gates were examined, there have been no investigations into flow measurement uncertainty using the existing rating tables for these gates. In this study, two commonly used rectangular gate sizes, 0.46 m (18-in.) and 0.61 m (24-in.), were tested under scenarios of various gate openings, upstream heads, and head differences. Coefficient of discharge ( | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Rating Rectangular Farm Delivery Meter Gates for Flow Measurement | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 142 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 1 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000931 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |
