Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSamer Madanat
dc.contributor.authorSrinivas Bulusu
dc.contributor.authorAmr Mahmoud
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:23:08Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:23:08Z
dc.date.copyrightSeptember 1995
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.other43850333.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79248
dc.description.abstractInfrastructure distress models predict the initiation and progression of distress on a facility over time as a function of age, design characteristics, environmental factors, and so on. Examples of facility distress included cracking, potholing, and rutting. Facility condition survey data sets typically include a large number of structural zeros indicating absence of distress at the time of observation. Most distress progression models in the literature are simple regression models that are estimated using the sample of observations for which distress has been initiated. These models are statistically erroneous because they suffer from selectivity bias due to the nonrandom nature of the estimation sample used. In this paper, we apply two econometric methods to estimate joint discrete-continuous models of infrastructure distress initiation and progression while correcting for selectivity bias. These methods are Heckman's procedure and the full information maximum likelihood method. An empirical case study demonstrates these methods for the case of highway-pavement-cracking models. It is shown that selectivity bias can be a very serious problem in such models.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEstimation of Infrastructure Distress Initiation and Progression Models
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(146)
dc.treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;1995:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record