Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSherrie Koechling
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:20:22Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:20:22Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other42116414.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78111
dc.description.abstractGovernment Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 34 gave state and local governments the choice of using depreciation or a modified approach when reporting on their infrastructure assets. The modified approach allows for an asset management system to be implemented. Despite much discussion between engineers and accountants, most often the accountant will choose depreciation over an asset management system. This article presents seven accounting arguments for engineers to persuade their accountants to try an asset management approach.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleHow to Convince your Accountant that Asset Management is the Correct Choice for Infrastructure Under GASB 34
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2004)4:1(10)
dc.treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record