Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdmund V. Caplicki III
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:20:07Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:20:07Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other41957054.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/77994
dc.description.abstractVirtually every construction contract contains a changes clause that permits an owner to make changes to the work or accommodate unanticipated changes and provides a mechanism for the contractor to be paid for such changes. Usually, the changes provision requires the contractor to receive a written change order, or at least written authorization, prior to proceeding with the work or risk not being paid for that extra work. Likewise, bid documents usually require any interpretations be in writing in order for them to be binding. Unfortunately, far too often contractors bid on a job or perform extra work without first obtaining the written clarification or authorization. While some owners may pay for the work anyway, they are usually not required to do so in the absence of a waiver of the contract requirement. In
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleContractor Not Entitled to Recover for Extra Work in Absence of Written Authorization
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume131
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(138)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record