• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Bridge Systems Considering Number of Sensing Nodes

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    40122651.pdf (1.441Mb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Minwoo
    Chang
    Shamim N.
    Pakzad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A series of optimal sensor placement (OSP) techniques is discussed in this paper. A framework for deciding the optimum number and location of sensors is proposed, to establish an effective structural health monitoring (SHM) system. The vibration response from an optimized sensor network reduces the installation and operational cost, simplifies the computational processes for a SHM system, and ensures an accurate estimation of monitoring parameters. In particular, the proposed framework focuses on the determination of the number of sensors and their proper locations to estimate modal properties of bridge systems. The relative importance of sensing locations in terms of signal strength was obtained by applying several OSP techniques, which include effective influence (EI), EI-driving point residue (EI-DPR), and kinetic energy (KE) methods. Additionally, the modified variance (MV) method, based on the principal component analysis (PCA), was developed with the assumption of independence in modal ordinates at each sensing location. Modal assurance criterion (MAC) between the target and interpolated mode shapes from an optimal sensor set was utilized as an effective measure to determine the number of sensors. The proposed framework is verified by three examples: (1) a numerically simulated simply supported beam, (2) finite-element (FE) model of the Northampton Street Bridge (NSB), and (3) modal information identified using a set of wireless sensor data from the Golden Gate Bridge (GGB). These three examples demonstrate the application and efficiency of the proposed framework to optimize the number of sensors and verify the performance of the MV method compared to the EI, EI-DPR, and KE methods.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/76474
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV