Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThevaneyan K.
dc.contributor.authorDavid
dc.contributor.authorJohn P.
dc.contributor.authorForth
dc.contributor.authorJianqiao
dc.contributor.authorYe
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:15:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:15:35Z
dc.date.copyrightJune 2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.other40016223.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/75396
dc.description.abstractRecords show that research leading to the successful introduction of integral-type structures such as continuous beams and frames actually began in the 1930s. Simple stub-type abutments have been found to perform well and are recommended for widespread use. The purpose of this analysis was to consider the behavior of the superstructure and substructure/backfill soil when they are subjected to thermally induced lateral movement and vertically imposed load at deck level. With the Oasys Safe finite-element analysis programs, finite-element models were developed to represent a typical stub-type integral abutment bridge configuration and backfill/foundation soil profile. It was found that the behavior of the superstructure of an integral bridge was predominantly influenced by the loading magnitude, irrespective of backfill soil properties. The results suggest that when designing the superstructure, the design requirements to resist the imposed loading may be sufficient to accommodate any effects attributable to the thermal load.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleSuperstructure Behavior of a Stub-Type Integral Abutment Bridge
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume19
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000583
dc.treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 006
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record