• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Charrettes and Their Characteristics on Achieved LEED Certification

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    39914112.pdf (927.5Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Michael W.
    Knox
    Caroline M.
    Clevenger
    Brian H.
    Dunbar
    Katharine E.
    Leigh
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Charrettes are collaborative, interdisciplinary workshops commonly used in the programming and or design phases of sustainable building projects and often utilized in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) projects. Charrettes are implemented to increase collaboration and communication across diverse building professionals and stakeholders. However, minimal empirical research documenting the outcomes or impact of charrette processes or identifying whether specific charrette characteristics or combinations of characteristics actually contribute to an overall increase of LEED points exists. The purpose of this research project was to research salient characteristics of charrette processes and to observe their impact on the LEED points achieved. Methodology included a focus group of nine building professionals and a survey of 66 building professionals who had participated in a LEED-certified project(s). Characteristics derived from the focus group discussion were used to develop the survey instrument. Implementing at least one charrette during a project was shown to increase the LEED points achieved by an average of seven points. Three charrette characteristics, however, were shown to reduce the magnitude of positive impact. Specific characteristics to avoid are (1) holding a charrette as a LEED strategy or LEED checklist meeting; (2) having a defined or structured agenda; and (3) having project goals already defined prior to the charrette(s) taking place. Overall, results suggest the charrette process has the potential to provide significant benefits, but to fully realize such a benefit, the charrette should not include factors that limit a group’s ability to produce creative ideas, goals, and innovative solutions.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/74380
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV