| dc.contributor.author | Howard G. Sachs | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:12:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T22:12:04Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | October 2008 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 39829973.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73354 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The matter of design fault is presented in a timeless case from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts regarding a concrete light pole. The detail in the printed ruling provides engineering students with remarkable insight into the design process and the failure of that process to adequately consider the potential of product failure and the impact on both automobiles and pedestrians. The court had strong opinions on the failure of Boston Edison design engineers. Students readily understand the impact of omission of foreseeability of design failure, and the case thus serves as a discussion prompt in considering engineering professionalism and potential legal consequences. | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Using <i>Bernier v. Boston Edison</i> to Teach Undergraduate Engineering Students about Professional Responsibility | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 134 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 4 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:4(380) | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |