Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoward G. Sachs
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:12:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:12:04Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.other39829973.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73354
dc.description.abstractThe matter of design fault is presented in a timeless case from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts regarding a concrete light pole. The detail in the printed ruling provides engineering students with remarkable insight into the design process and the failure of that process to adequately consider the potential of product failure and the impact on both automobiles and pedestrians. The court had strong opinions on the failure of Boston Edison design engineers. Students readily understand the impact of omission of foreseeability of design failure, and the case thus serves as a discussion prompt in considering engineering professionalism and potential legal consequences.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleUsing <i>Bernier v. Boston Edison</i> to Teach Undergraduate Engineering Students about Professional Responsibility
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume134
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:4(380)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record