Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYi Lu
dc.contributor.authorJiuping Xu
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:10:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:10:24Z
dc.date.copyrightAugust 2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.other37147111.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72813
dc.description.abstractFrequent catastrophic earthquakes have highlighted the significance of postearthquake recovery and reconstruction (PERR) planning, a dynamic and inclusive process which encourages the building of more resilient communities. This paper aims to provide some meaningful lessons for quake-prone countries through a review, comparison, and discussion of PERR planning success and failure factors in the 1994 Northridge earthquake in the United States, the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan, the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran, and the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. The authors then provide some guidance for PERR planning in key areas such as formulating predisaster planning, enabling participatory planning, capacity building for public involvement, schedule control, process coordination, developing catastrophe insurance, protecting vulnerable groups, and assessing plan quality. Further in-depth studies could be done to conduct broader crossnational comparisons on some important specific aspects, such as predisaster planning, participatory planning, and plan implementation.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleComparative Study on the Key Issues of Postearthquake Recovery and Reconstruction Planning: Lessons from the United States, Japan, Iran, and China
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume16
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000172
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2015:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record