• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Overview of Innovative Life-Risk Analysis Method for the 2012 California Central Valley Flood Protection Plan

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    36417684.pdf (1.170Mb)
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Stephen Cowdin
    William Sicke
    Natalie King
    David Ford
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The State of California’s 2012 Central Valley flood protection plan (CVFPP)—a large-scale reconnaissance-level assessment of flood management problems and potential solutions—formulated a set of broad management alternatives and compared them by assessing risk reduction attributable to each. Both economic risk and life risk were assessed and compared. Economic risk was evaluated with standard U.S. Army Corps of Engineers methods and software. Inputs that described the flood hazard, flood-management system performance, property exposure, and vulnerability to damage were developed by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) using state-of-practice models (hydrologic, hydraulic, geotechnical, and economic) and data. After considering life-risk analysis methods proposed in the literature, for the CVFPP reconnaissance-level analysis, DWR developed and applied an innovative method that leveraged the economic-risk analysis method and its inputs. Measures of hazard and performance remained the same as for the economic-risk analysis, but exposure in the floodplain was expressed in terms of population at risk, and vulnerability was expressed as a relationship between hazard and life-loss. The new analysis yielded a description of risk in terms of probability of various magnitudes of life-loss, which could be integrated to estimate an expected value. Although approximate, the method provided systematic, repeatable, timely estimates of life-risk for a variety of alternatives considered, allowing fair comparison of the management alternatives for high-level planning studies. However, this method can only broadly support real-time emergency response decision making and other activities that require more detailed conceptual accounting of complex flooding and human response.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72615
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV