Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCraig H. Benson
dc.contributor.authorDavid E. Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:07:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:07:24Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.other29792842.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71779
dc.description.abstractThe stochastic models described in a companion paper were used to analyze compacted soil liners with a variable number of 15 cm (6 in.) thick lifts. No optimum number of lifts could be defined based on first‐passage time; first‐passage time increased as the thickness increased. Both models showed that the flux through the liner and the equivalent hydraulic conductivity decreased and the mean hydraulic conductivity (modeled as a lognormally distributed random variable) of lifts decreased. There was little benefit to increasing the number of lifts beyond four to six lifts. An analysis of case histories of in situ hydraulic conductivity also showed little reduction in hydraulic conductivity when the number of lifts was increased beyond four to six. Based upon hydraulic conductivity considerations, the recommended minimum thickness of compacted soil liners is four to six lifts, or 60 cm to 90 cm (2 ft to 3 ft).
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleMinimum Thickness of Compacted Soil Liners: II. Analysis and Case Histories
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume120
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(153)
dc.treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record