Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCraig H. Benson
dc.contributor.authorDavid E. Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T22:07:02Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T22:07:02Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.other29412555.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71687
dc.description.abstractRegulatory agencies often specify a minimum thickness of compacted soil liners that will ensure that the liner performs adequately. No consensus has been formed, however, on an appropriate minimum thickness. In some states soil liners may be as thin as 60 cm (2 ft), whereas in other states soil liners are required to be at least 360 cm (12 ft) thick. Difficulties encountered in the analysis of soil liners, such as uncertainties in construction, flow in macropores, and spatial variability of hydraulic properties, and variability in past experiences of regulatory agencies are the most likely reasons for the lack of consensus on minimum thickness. In the present paper, the first in a two‐part series, two models of fluid flow in compacted soil liners are described. These models incorporate flow in macropores, spatial variability, and uncertainty via probability theory, but only consider advective transport in saturated soil. In the second paper, the models are used to identify an appropriate minimum thickness of soil liners.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleMinimum Thickness of Compacted Soil Liners: I. Stochastic Models
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume120
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(129)
dc.treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record